• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Electrical Rates Skyrocket

BodeMiller1

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 7, 2022
Messages
1,710
Points
63
Location
Barre, VT
What's going to happen is HQ is going to run the line in Vermont or Maine.

Oneside: "We need jobs build towers."
Twoside: "Save the toads and snapping turtles."

What a mess. Now my Cannon day ticket is above $25.

Meow
 

TyWebb

Active member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
136
Points
28

HowieT2

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
1,637
Points
63
This prompted me to look at my most recent bill from Coned in NY. Supply charge was 11.2558¢/kWh.
I guess we dont have woke people here in NYS.
 

Former Sunday Rivah Rat

Active member
Joined
Mar 26, 2020
Messages
199
Points
28
I looks like the big hikes are coming here in november. Completely Self inflicted. FJB!

 

1dog

Active member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
601
Points
43
I've noticed people around here are terrible at judging sarcasm...I guarantee you there will be people that think you are being serious.
It is the actual truth. Administration didn't shut down fracking on day one? We were (for the 1st time in 75 years) energy independent. And no one, anywhere, is going to do it cleaner, with benefits to anyone who uses organic, earth-made energy. That would be everybody.
 

1dog

Active member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
601
Points
43
'cause the Washington(Com)Post and the NYT are paragons of objectivity . . best not to disparage the reporting as it smells of #5.

but I digress - did they shut it down or not?

Man, do we need snow.
 

jaytrem

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
1,992
Points
83
It is the actual truth. Administration didn't shut down fracking on day one? We were (for the 1st time in 75 years) energy independent. And no one, anywhere, is going to do it cleaner, with benefits to anyone who uses organic, earth-made energy. That would be everybody.
The author clearly has no clue about the complexity of the rules in a modern pinball machine. Loses all credibility right there.
 

Smellytele

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
9,953
Points
113
Location
Right where I want to be

1dog

Active member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
601
Points
43

x10003q

Active member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
913
Points
43
Location
Bergen County, NJ
Here's what Germany is doing - talk about walking it back ( it is all about energy density when all is said and done)

And this from Goldman Sachs commodities research: https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/10/3-8-trillion-for.php
The article you site is about German fossil fuel usage is wrong.

Renewable electricity generation fed into the German grid is around 48% and German renewable production is around 41% so the 82% fossil fuel number is wrong. Coal is 31% and natural gas is 12%. That does not add up to 82%. Also, the article conveniently leaves out what happened to German nuclear electric production.

The Germans completely panicked after the Japanese nuke plant in Fukashima was hit by a tsunami in 2011. The Germans closed most of the nukes way before they planned and had to buy electricty from Polish (and other) coal generators to make up the difference. Eventually, the Germans fired up their own coal plants. Before the Fukashima disaster, Germany had a plan to phase off their own nuclear generation by 2036 and simultaneously switch to 'green' generation. If they stuck to their own plan, maybe they would have succeeded in reducing the German fossil fuel usage even more.
 

1dog

Active member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
601
Points
43
The article you site is about German fossil fuel usage is wrong.

Renewable electricity generation fed into the German grid is around 48% and German renewable production is around 41% so the 82% fossil fuel number is wrong. Coal is 31% and natural gas is 12%. That does not add up to 82%. Also, the article conveniently leaves out what happened to German nuclear electric production.

The Germans completely panicked after the Japanese nuke plant in Fukashima was hit by a tsunami in 2011. The Germans closed most of the nukes way before they planned and had to buy electricty from Polish (and other) coal generators to make up the difference. Eventually, the Germans fired up their own coal plants. Before the Fukashima disaster, Germany had a plan to phase off their own nuclear generation by 2036 and simultaneously switch to 'green' generation. If they stuck to their own plan, maybe they would have succeeded in reducing the German fossil fuel usage even more.
82% is world-wide, not specific to Germany's sources in particular. At least that's the Goldman research conclusion.
 

MidnightJester

Active member
Joined
Oct 7, 2011
Messages
909
Points
43
This is why... Joe Biden is the main guy currently behind our rising electric costs. Handlers and Puppet strings or not he is the USA bus driver. He's a believer I think in the Green new deal and downfall of the USA

FgziOWAXkAAoln9

FgziOWDXEAEiNLT

"It is time he learn a lesson that his words matter and have consequences" -Joe Manchin-

That means please vote against him(Joe Biden's candidates) from a Democrat(rare breed) that is actually trying too and helping to build up and save America.
 
Last edited:
Top