Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
snowbrains.com
Call me skeptical. I talked to a guy last week up at Snowbird who said, "hey, did you hear about the 100 inch base at Jay Peak?" I laughed.Vermont’s Jay Peak Smashes 25-Year-Old Record Hitting 113 Inches of Snowfall Already this Season
Jay Peak, Vermont, is having one of its best starts to a ski season in over 25 years. We woke up to 8 to 10 inches in the past 24 hours, bringing this end-of-November storm to 14 inches in 48 hours and putting our season total at 113 inches. That sets a new record for November at Jay and caps off a stretch of weather that lined up with perfect timing. Snow began Thanksgiving evening, paused just long enough for folks to scarf down some turkey, then ramped right back up for Day of the Devoted and stayed steady through last night.![]()
[PHOTOS] Vermont's Jay Peak Smashes 25-Year-Old Record Hitting 103 Inches of Snowfall Already this Season - SnowBrains
Vermont's Jay Peak Smashes 25-Year-Old Record, Hitting 103 Inches of Snowfall Already this Season.snowbrains.com
Jay Peak’s weatherman, Tim Kelley, projected an additional four to five inches on Thanksgiving, which would have pushed Jay Peak over the 100-inch mark for the season. Jay Peak received four inches of snow on Thanksgiving evening. Currently, Jay Peak’s base depth is between 16 and 36 inches, and it has 23 trails, a terrain park, and four lifts operating.
A low-pressure system is forecast to move in this weekend, bringing some Arctic air. These snow cycles are expected to continue through the first week of December.
- Related: Jackson Hole Mountain Resort, WY, Delays Opening Day Amid Warm Weather and Limited Snowfall
Last season, the resort recorded 475 inches of snow, its highest total since the 2016-17 season, when it recorded 491 inches. Will Jay Peak have another great year? If November is any indication of what is yet to come, then the answer is a definite yes.
![]()
Call me skeptical. I talked to a guy last week up at Snowbird who said, "hey, did you hear about the 100 inch base at Jay Peak?" I laughed.
Exactly they measure a snow drift next to the building, if it's a foot they say there must be 2 ft at the Summit. They definitely get more snow than anywhere else on the east coast but there numbers are questionableThere's a reason why Jay Peak doesn't have a snow stake webcam like everyone else.
Yeah I agree. Stowe gets a good bit but jay just gets more on average. The jay cloud is a very real thing.Nah, Jay gets by far the most snow on the East Coast, and it’s not close.
The Good Dr. has just stated a paradigm its taken me a lifetime to understand ( and I still have a hard time grasping it). Its all about perception, forget the facts. Pols know this, corporate media know this.The biggest issues with snow reporting reliability IMHO, especially in the eyes of many who have become very passionate about this great sport in say the last 5yrs or so, and don't have either the experience that decades of skiing/riding with tons of experience with mountain weather, and/or don't fully get that say a 10-30 second clip posted on social media often just shows 1 small section of a big mountain spread out over often a few thousand vertical feet, and the weather (and snowfall amounts) at the base most of the time will be different, if not very different, at the summit. Not unlike when you see someone from the flatlands traveling hours to get to a resort, and see that the high temp for say Burlington is supposed to be say 25, but then they're surprised when its say 12 degrees at the base at 9:30AM and 5 degrees at the summit.
Snow reporting wise, the highest, summit numbers get the wow factor, when those numbers might only give the story for the top say 1/4 of the mtn, and at the base, especially in early and late season elevation storms, it may be magnitude less snow, and even at times no snow at all. Many don't get that, and hence why in this rant about it on social media era, you get folks complaining about weather reality, when the bigger issue often is their own ignorance to what weather reality is
The simple answer, if one was interested in providing accurate information more than hype, would be to provide more than 1 snowfall total - at least summit + a base area, possibly a mid-mountain location as well if a resort has a particularly wide elevation range like Killington.The biggest issues with snow reporting reliability IMHO, especially in the eyes of many who have become very passionate about this great sport in say the last 5yrs or so, and don't have either the experience that decades of skiing/riding with tons of experience with mountain weather, and/or don't fully get that say a 10-30 second clip posted on social media often just shows 1 small section of a big mountain spread out over often a few thousand vertical feet, and the weather (and snowfall amounts) at the base most of the time will be different, if not very different, at the summit. Not unlike when you see someone from the flatlands traveling hours to get to a resort, and see that the high temp for say Burlington is supposed to be say 25, but then they're surprised when its say 12 degrees at the base at 9:30AM and 5 degrees at the summit.
Snow reporting wise, the highest, summit numbers get the wow factor, when those numbers might only give the story for the top say 1/4 of the mtn, and at the base, especially in early and late season elevation storms, it may be magnitude less snow, and even at times no snow at all. Many don't get that, and hence why in this rant about it on social media era, you get folks complaining about weather reality, when the bigger issue often is their own ignorance to what weather reality is
The simple answer, if one was interested in providing accurate information more than hype, would be to provide more than 1 snowfall total - at least summit + a base area, possibly a mid-mountain location as well if a resort has a particularly wide elevation range like Killington.
I don't expect to see resorts ever start doing this, but I'm just noting that it's not a difficult problem to solve.