SIKSKIER
New member
Dumbass of the week award to me.Yes,Labor Day.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Maybe cheaper but 3 hours of driving for 4 days in a row would suck. I would rather not ski at that point. Driving back and forth to any mountain would be cheaper than owning a house near a mountain to but...
One clarification regarding taxes. Tax dollars spent on Cannon have an impact that is greater than the income received from the mountain itself. The people who ski at Cannon also pay taxes at hotels, gas stations, restaurants, etc. So the real question is whether or not the TOTAL revenues generated by Cannon (whether on-site or off-site) are greater than the total expenditure.
As far as off-site revenues are concerned, you would have eliminate tax revenues from money that would have been spent in NH even if Cannon did not exist. For example, if a family would have spent the same amount of money at restaurants and hotels while skiing Loon if Cannon was closed, those tax revenues should be excluded. I'm certainly not smart enough to figure out that calculation.
This is a really interesting point. As others have said, it seems very difficult to quantify but there is definitely a reality here. Take me for example:
I bought a house in Lincoln specifically to ski Cannon. I would not have bought in Lincoln to ski Loon. And may not have bought in NH at all. So ALL of the money that I contribute is specifically attributable to Cannon. That includes property taxes, meals taxes, gas, utilities, etc, etc. Before buying the house we were day-trippers and skied all over New England. Now 90% of our days are at Cannon. This represents another significant increase in our personal expenditures in NH vs other states thanks directly to Cannon. Cannon's terrain is part of the story, but the relatively low cost of passes was equally important in our decision of where to buy. If Cannon's passes cost as much as Loon's we probably would have looked elsewhere. I'm not sure of the exact figure, but it's in the tens-of-thousands of dollars per year that we as a single household are contributing to NH economy specifically because Cannon is a great, low-cost ski area.
Thanks Cannonball for contributing to our tax system> while we do bitch about massholes they really do help our economy without burdening our schools and other services. yes they do use our roads and some services but far less than those who live here full-time.
You're welcome. And I pay the tolls, so no bitching about the road usage either.
NH Roads are much better than MA roads
But doesn't certain lower mountain trails become inaccessible when the tram is not in operation? How do you get back to the Zoomer lift without hiking? Killington is a perfect example of a ski area that closes certain lifts during the week. Even with these closures all terrain is not only still accessable but easy to get to a lift from after skiing down.
NH Roads are much better than MA roads
The roads in Chile are better than MA roads.
Probably true and less corruption
Not sure about that. But how's this for sending the Cannon debate into a tailspin..... The roads in Chile are in better shape because they are privatized (true).
Probably true and less corruption
When did this turn into shit on mass day?
NH roads are plowed much better than VT roads - at least roads in northern VT.
...they louse money at a place in North VT.
Remind me to only use credit cards when visiting North VT.
I think you want to fumigate and change you get back.