Smellytele
Well-known member
Boarding the K-1 today from the parking lot side was kind of a PIA but...
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Lift construction doesn't really work like that. A new lift means new towers, regardless of weight limits or anything of the like. Leitner-Poma, Doppelmayer, and all those other lift builders design their lifts from the ground up, so using old towers from a different type of lift, you'd never get any lift designer to go for it.
Killington is seriously looking at an 8-pack to replace the snowdon quad. They would also add snowmaking to northstar trail and cut several more trails in that area.
Killington is seriously looking at an 8-pack to replace the snowdon quad. They would also add snowmaking to northstar trail and cut several more trails in that area.
There going to combine low rider north star and patsy's into a super highway..
That would be a shame, Northstar is one of my favorite trails on Snowdon. It still has an old style New England trail feel to it. It would be like what they did to Superstar & Skyelark over on Skye Peak. I don't really see a need for a 6 pack or 8 pack to replace the Snowdon quad. I very rarely see a line for the quad now. Can you imagine the traffic in mixing bowl or lower caper with an 8 pack serving Snowdon?
Big picture down the road, if both the interconnect and the "village" happen, that side of K is going to be seeing a bunch more traffic than it does now and they'll need the capacity, be it a high speed 6 or 8 seater
That is a big "IF". They've been talking about both for decades. No closer to seeing that happen today then 20 years ago.
2 major problems I've noticed with 6 packs that I think ski area's overlook:
1. Queue management. What good is a lift that seats 6 plus if you can't fill all the seats? Lifties often times don't fill gaps. Many times I'll see a six pack with a long line, yet chairs going up the mountain with 4-5 people on it
2. Unloading. With more people on the chair, it's harder to coordinate with other skiers/riders when it comes to offload. The guy on the left side of the chair takes a right when unloading, and the guy on the right takes a left and....WHAM! There's a collision on the offloading ramping, the skiers go down, and the liftie is forced to stop the lift until the skiers can get up, grab there ski's/ poles, and get out of the way. The uphill capacity on paper may be higher on paper than the lift it replaced, but in reality the ACTUAL uphill lift capacity may be the same due to more stoppages.
Not quite sure that K has had such an aggressive management in place in about 20 yrs either.
It seems like the days of K "shrinking" and bringing their game back towards the competition seem to have ended and K seems to be back into a position where all others are poised to follow.
I have said for years now, that the entire Northeast Ski Industry benefits from a K that is "strong" and "aggressive"
Sent from my DROID RAZR using AlpineZone mobile app
Prez. Smith or ASC weren't aggressive? That's news to me. If anyone hasn't been aggressive it's Powdr & up until last year received a lot of complaints. If you think about it the only thing that has changed/new over the past year is public relations. The new Peak Lodge was planned well before the new management team stepped in. Powdr has bigger problems at Park City right now & really don't have anything to say about the village. Powdr doesn't own the land where the new village is proposed.