squaw/tahoe can be hit or miss too...the year I lived there we had no real snow (skiing manmade on Red Dog all Dec and most of Jan) up until Feb 28...then we got a 7' dump followed by another 21' of snow at the mtn in March...needless to say March was insane. When Tahoe misses, it seems to miss big, but when it hits, it hits BIG. I'd rank Whistler/blackcomb ahead of Squaw...but I had 4.5' of snow the first time I was there...since then I've skied there in the rain too...sometimes our perception is colored by the conditions we experienced...but the thread was "assume good conditions" so I'd put Whistler ahead of Squaw...more terrain, more vert, and a sweet ass village with great nightlife.
Good points. In Whistler it can take you all day to get from blackcomb over to the goods at whistler. I skied mostly Blackcomb cause I just did not want to take the trip over. I could find the same stuff where i was for the most part. Squaw however I could get to any part of the hill wtihin 20 minutes. Most in 10. I really appreciated that quality.. I went out last year so snow was pretty good. I went to whistler 2 years ago. They had a very good year when I was there.
You know what. The truth be known its like argueing about a super model. I want the brunette. I want the blond. I am lucky to experience both.