• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Cannon Lover's Thread

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,178
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
I don't really like a tram but not sure the mtn (especially the midmtn) could handle that kind of volume. If they spend all that money on a new tram I can only hope it runs 7 days.

Even staying with the Tram, I wish they added another trail to spread people out mid mountain. Problem is the only spot would be skiers right of extension, which is wicked steep and full of cliffs. So, there's probably nothing they can do
 

Smellytele

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
10,113
Points
113
Location
Right where I want to be
Even staying with the Tram, I wish they added another trail to spread people out mid mountain. Problem is the only spot would be skiers right of extension, which is wicked steep and full of cliffs. So, there's probably nothing they can do
Widen the old double line a little. I do like skiing it the way it is but just an option
 

hardscrabble

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2022
Messages
56
Points
18
I wonder if a little bit of revegetation between Gremlin and Rock Garden would help at all. Maybe leave the last opening that allows you to get back to the front 5/tram from Ravine, but have it be solid trees from there up to where Spookie comes in or something like that. Wouldn't really add anything new, but taking away a few needless intersections might help streamline things a bit.
 

ceo

Active member
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
398
Points
28
Cannon's biggest problem has always been that its layout is really constrained by the topography.
 

urungus

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
1,991
Points
113
Location
Western Mass
Wonder what the installation cost savings would be for a gondy vs Tram? My (bad) memory says SR’s Chondola was a $15M project. That was a long time ago.
I can’t imagine the savings would be that much, gondola install requires many more towers, plus the cost of a hundred or so cabins
 

hardscrabble

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2022
Messages
56
Points
18
According to the Liftblog twitter thread, a gondola would cost $10-15 million. I feel like it would be less of a summer/fall draw in the long run though, as it would become 1 of 3 (4 if Waterville's full expansion plans come to fruition) in the region rather than the standout attraction that the tram would continue to be. Also agree 100% that installing a bunch of towers on DJ's would be a headache and a half. (And it would be more vulnerable to wind.... and create too much skier traffic... the list goes on)
 
Last edited:

Former Sunday Rivah Rat

Active member
Joined
Mar 26, 2020
Messages
213
Points
43
Anyone have an idea what is going on with the mittersil double? another weekend it is going to remain dormant. They made snow from the top of barons all the way down
I was going to go there this week and saw that. They just finished blowing Mittersill. WTF is Cannon's problem?
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
333
Points
18
Location
Northern CT
Was planning to head there Thursday. Zoomer offline and needing repairs and Mitt double not running. Will they run the tram mid-week to compensate for lack of uphill capacity or will it only be Peabody and Cannonball?

Anyone have more info?
 

machski

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
3,863
Points
113
Location
Northwood, NH (Sunday River, ME)
According to the Liftblog twitter thread, a gondola would cost $10-15 million. I feel like it would be less of a summer/fall draw in the long run though, as it would become 1 of 3 (4 if Waterville's full expansion plans come to fruition) in the region rather than the standout attraction that the tram would continue to be. Also agree 100% that installing a bunch of towers on DJ's would be a headache and a half. (And it would be more vulnerable to wind.... and create too much skier traffic... the list goes on)
Easy way to throttle skier traffic and save a bunch of $$ is to not order the full complement of carriers the lift is designed to handle. I believe Bretton Woods did this for it's Gondi, as did Loon when the current Gondi replaced the old CS orange one. Same at Ragged with the 6 pack and Loon again initially on the North Peak Express.

As to Gondola attraction vs Tram, depends what is attracting tourists. If it's the lift itself, then yes a Gondi might be a downgrade. But if it's the views/scenery and height reached, Cannon would still win out over Loon/BW IMHO. Even if WV installs theirs from the Village up, it tops out on Green, not Tecumseh. Ehhh
 

hardscrabble

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2022
Messages
56
Points
18
Easy way to throttle skier traffic and save a bunch of $$ is to not order the full complement of carriers the lift is designed to handle.
Good point, hadn't thought of that. The gondola at Crystal Mtn. out in WA is another good example - 36 cabins on an almost 7,000-foot long lift.
 

snoseek

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
6,355
Points
113
Location
NH
I think they should address the staffing shortage before dropping millions of dollars on anything. Pay more would be a start.
 

ceo

Active member
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
398
Points
28
This article indicates that the NH Senate president, described as an avid hiker, is evidently on Team Tram, from the questions he asked the state natural resources commissioner at a hearing. They point out that a gondola would not only be vulnerable to wind, but because it would have to be much lower to the ground, would have much less of a view, which matters for summer riders. They also note that a gondola would actually be more expensive to install, because it would require completely replacing the terminal buildings, whereas a tram can use them as is. (This is why a replacement can go up to 100 passengers but no more, because you can make the cars longer but not wider.)
 

Edd

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 8, 2006
Messages
6,638
Points
113
Location
Newmarket, NH
This article indicates that the NH Senate president, described as an avid hiker, is evidently on Team Tram, from the questions he asked the state natural resources commissioner at a hearing. They point out that a gondola would not only be vulnerable to wind, but because it would have to be much lower to the ground, would have much less of a view, which matters for summer riders. They also note that a gondola would actually be more expensive to install, because it would require completely replacing the terminal buildings, whereas a tram can use them as is. (This is why a replacement can go up to 100 passengers but no more, because you can make the cars longer but not wider.)
He's directly at odds with the Guv, in terms of construction costs. Should be possible to find out who's right before making the call. The point about having a different view from the cars because the gondola is lower is interesting.
 

SkiMom80

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2016
Messages
67
Points
6
Anyone have an idea what is going on with the mittersil double? another weekend it is going to remain dormant. They made snow from the top of barons all the way down
Word on the street was that they were prepping Baron's for a race this week and wanted to limit traffic. I was pretty disappointed by it being closed as well!
 
Top