riverc0il
New member
31.3m according to PhysicsMans Sidecat Radius Calculator. Not an exact measurement but good approximation. That's still pretty damn straight in the sidecut department.
-
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Dynastar/Naxo Legend Early Tram Bindings
- Thread starter thetrailboss
- Start date
Hawkshot99
Active member
I have tried the heavy stiff ski route before for a back country setup. I had a pair of Rossi B-squads mounted with Marker Dukes. They were the stiffest skis I have ever skied. Much stiffer than my race ski.
I used them because I got them cheap. They were alot of work to ski in soft snow, and to cut through the trees. I am not exactly sure on the radius, but the next size up is a 34m radius. Did I mention how heavy they were? You felt it on the way up.
I now ski a pair of Scott P4's with the Marker Dukes. They are still a beefy ski, much more than my other friends like, but i am used to stiff skis. They turn way easier in the trees and soft stuff. Plus they weigh alot less. A whole lot more enjoyable ski for the back-country than my Rossi's were.
I used them because I got them cheap. They were alot of work to ski in soft snow, and to cut through the trees. I am not exactly sure on the radius, but the next size up is a 34m radius. Did I mention how heavy they were? You felt it on the way up.
I now ski a pair of Scott P4's with the Marker Dukes. They are still a beefy ski, much more than my other friends like, but i am used to stiff skis. They turn way easier in the trees and soft stuff. Plus they weigh alot less. A whole lot more enjoyable ski for the back-country than my Rossi's were.
Hawkshot99
Active member
I have tried the heavy stiff ski route before for a back country setup. I had a pair of Rossi B-squads mounted with Marker Dukes. They were the stiffest skis I have ever skied. Much stiffer than my race ski.
I used them because I got them cheap. They were alot of work to ski in soft snow, and to cut through the trees. I am not exactly sure on the radius, but the next size up is a 34m radius. Did I mention how heavy they were? You felt it on the way up.
I now ski a pair of Scott P4's with the Marker Dukes. They are still a beefy ski, much more than my other friends like, but i am used to stiff skis. They turn way easier in the trees and soft stuff. Plus they weigh alot less. A whole lot more enjoyable ski for the back-country than my Rossi's were.
I used them because I got them cheap. They were alot of work to ski in soft snow, and to cut through the trees. I am not exactly sure on the radius, but the next size up is a 34m radius. Did I mention how heavy they were? You felt it on the way up.
I now ski a pair of Scott P4's with the Marker Dukes. They are still a beefy ski, much more than my other friends like, but i am used to stiff skis. They turn way easier in the trees and soft stuff. Plus they weigh alot less. A whole lot more enjoyable ski for the back-country than my Rossi's were.
riverc0il
New member
Yea.
Thanks for the input guys. Based on the photos that Cannonball put up as well as considerations regarding weight, side cut, etc., I am scrapping this idea. However, I have another brainwave....
awf170
New member
Even though you already made up your mind I just wanted to state that I think Naxos are huge pieces of shit and I don't understand how anyone could like them who tours at least a decent amount.
