I don't entirely disagree, but they'll certainly make excellent moving slalom courses
They'll probably automatically alert the police to any "spirited" driving they capture with their cameras...
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
I don't entirely disagree, but they'll certainly make excellent moving slalom courses
I don't entirely disagree, but they'll certainly make excellent moving slalom courses
I'll bet that in 25 or 30 years, a robot car could easily win a Formula 1 race against a human. Unlike a human, you can dial in "the perfect lap" for a robot car and drive it mistake-free every time. Why do you think F1 bans automatic transmissions? A computer can shift far better than a human and it would be an unfair advantage.
So fast food places will not have urine and what ever else teenagers might put in the food, I can live with that.I disagree. Self-driving cars will work better than human-driven cars. Between RADAR and visual pattern recognition from cameras that can see more light spectrum than humans, robot cars will have no problem co-existing with human-driven cars. Unlike human-driven cars, they don't daydream, text message while driving, have Senior moments....
And yeah, it will be tough for the Teamsters. Basically, automation is going to put pretty much destroy all repetitive task jobs. Companies like Amazon already have robot 'pickers' in their warehouses. You'll walk into a fast food restaurant and there will be no humans. Machine-cooked and served food. Machines that clean the tables and floors. In the next 30 or 40 years, it will end up putting half the country out of work.
Another school of thought. If you remove the operator, you remove a lot of risk. You could, in theory remove a lot of the mandated safety stuff, thus reducing weight and fuel economy.
Not when you have bvibert out there endangering everybody because he thinks he's a bad-ass driver.![]()
Woah, glad I wasn't eating lunch when I read this.:wink:So fast food places will not have urine and what ever else teenagers might put in the food, I can live with that.
I could see a lane for automatic cars and lanes for manual driven...
In a traffic jam, that would give good incentive for people to upgrade. The automatic lane would zoom by with no morons hitting their brakes causing all the stop & go mess. The cars would be networked together so they'd know if a car a mile ahead needed to brake for something. On August 29, it gains self-awareness and can't be deactivated. It launches nuclear missiles at Russia and...
Terminator 2, right? It is an awesome movie, it's one of those movies I always watch if I see it flipping through the channels. Then there's, "Open the pod bay doors HAL." Here's a little trivia for you, no Googling, why did Arthur C Clarke name the computer in 2001 HAL?
Here's a little trivia for you, no Googling, why did Arthur C Clarke name the computer in 2001 HAL?
Terminator 2, right? It is an awesome movie, it's one of those movies I always watch if I see it flipping through the channels. Then there's, "Open the pod bay doors HAL." Here's a little trivia for you, no Googling, why did Arthur C Clarke name the computer in 2001 HAL?
I'm almost embarrassed to answer that.
IBM -one letter off...
Yes, you are correct. Arthur C Clarke was quite the visionary, he came up with the idea of geocentric orbiting sattelites, their orbit is called the "Clarke Belt". Not too shabby for a science fiction writer.
War Games was good too Scotty, "Shall we play a game?"
Having the option to caravan up on highways makes sense to me. Being required to do it, not so much. That is, it makes sense, but I don't like it.