• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

How Fat can an East Coast skier go?

ctenidae

Active member
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
8,959
Points
38
Location
SW Connecticut
I'd be quite surprised if the difference you felt between those skis had anything to do with that 3mm. You're talkin about less than one-tenth of an inch! JMHO

Sure, part of the diff was probably going from a less-than-high quality ski to a nice ski, plus the (seemingly) foot wide nose on the Heads, but it sure felt different. Among other sensations was a noticeable difference in the overall width.

Either way, the Heads are wider, and they skied better. Correlation may not equal causation, but I'm going with it.
 

molecan

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
120
Points
18
Location
Glen, NH
Well,

I picked up a pair of 183 Volkl Gotama's over the summer, and they are 105mm waist, but with the severe upturn on the tail, look like they will actually ski much shorter.
I also was given a pair of (beater) 180 Explosiv's w/a 95mm waist.
The explosiv's were a friends _only_ ski for a season or two, mounted tele. They were used in all conditions, but when snow permitted, almost 100% off-piste.

I'm likely to try the explosiv as a day to day ski, and the Gotama I'd like be on as often as possible.

My day-to-day groomer ski was the Bandit X (70mm), which for my size is near useless in any deep snow, and after 30-40 days are feeling pretty dead.

I had a pair of 180 Atomic Beta Carv 9.11 (67mm?) I got a few years ago, which I will never ski again. Worst ski (IMO) I've ever owned.


I've never owned a ski w/more than 70mm waist before, so like the switch a few years back to a sub 200cm ski, w/sidecut, this will be an interesting test.
 

Vano

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
102
Points
0
Location
New Jersey
molecan said:
Well,

I picked up a pair of 183 Volkl Gotama's over the summer, and they are 105mm waist, but with the severe upturn on the tail, look like they will actually ski much shorter.
I also was given a pair of (beater) 180 Explosiv's w/a 95mm waist.

The Explosivs may be ok in the east, but definitely not ideal. I skied them once, and even though they were very 'carvy' for such a wide ski 95mm under foot is still 95mm under foot. I haven't tried the Gotamas but i have heard that they are very versatile for such a wide ski.
 
Top