from_the_NEK
Active member
Note to Greg:
Alpine Zone - Your place for the latest news on skiing, boarding, hiking, gear, lodging and nuclear physics.
![]()
I like it! I expect that to be the rallying cry at the AZ gathering at Sugarloaf :beer:
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Note to Greg:
Alpine Zone - Your place for the latest news on skiing, boarding, hiking, gear, lodging and nuclear physics.
![]()
Radioactive decay continues to produce heat after the fission process is stopped by the control rods. It takes several months to completely cool off to where it won't melt down.
My question is that if the fuel rods do melt and the material falls to the floor of the reactor core, away from the control rods, can the fission process resume?
Obviously, you have some engineering or scientific background. It could be Ghidra!!!
Radioactive decay continues to produce heat after the fission process is stopped by the control rods. It takes several months to completely cool off to where it won't melt down.
My question is that if the fuel rods do melt and the material falls to the floor of the reactor core, away from the control rods, can the fission process resume?
To the first point: Yes, that's what I implied. Godzilla was a joke. Mothra, maybe not so much.
To the second point: I believe it can potentially ramp back up, depending on what happens to the rods- melted in, maybe not as fast. PuckIt probably knows better.
If fission is not occuring, what's creating the heat? Godzilla? Maybe Mothra?
Biology major/physics minor for a period.
I forgot about Ghidra. That would be, as we say in the business, sub-optimal. Rodan's on vacation this week, so it could get ugly...
But just so it is clear for everybody, fission and decay are two somewhat separate forms of energy release.
Fission is the physical process of splitting atoms via neutron bombardment.
Decay is the process of unstable atoms releasing radioactive energy particles as they degrade into lighter elements. Different materials have different rates of decay.
Edit: That advanced physics class in high school is starting to come back to me. Nuclear Physics is the one part of that class I did well in![]()
You are claiming some sort of fact without backing it up with either a good explanation or pointing to an example. You are a terrible debater.
There is no on/off switch on a nuclear reactor, they only can slow the reaction by inserting the control rods and cooling the whole thing. If any of those go wrong the whole thing heats up again. Fully shutting it down take's a very long time.
Scramming the reactors drops the control rods all the way, which stops the majority of the fission reaction immediately. But not all. What's still going on generates heat, which needs to be cooled.
Yes that is the issue with the rods melting. Control rods can no longer be inserted into the material. This is why the fuel rods are pellets stacked on top of each other to make the rods. The control rods are between and control the fission by accepting the emitted particle from the radioatcive material in the rods. The boron rods are actuallt B10 not the abundant B11 isotope. B10 is a neutron asborber. The larger mass of radioactive material con not be controlled and go "critical", that is meltdown thru vessel.
Strange combo though
BTW, what haven't we agreed on?
Children,
Can we get back to nuclear reactors and behave like nerdy scientists again?
If you must insult each other, there's a perfect forum that goes by the name TGR. Let's get back to our "dull and boring" old selves.
Especially since I ended up, 8 years later, with a BSBA in Finance, and then an MBA.
I'm a triple threat- science, numbers, and bullshit. I can do it all.
Nothing in this thread. Some old politics stuff. :beer:
C-10-------------------------- POTD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! nice to see a little bit o humor again
Just listening now:beer:Noted, but I think since the "wax" guy left the discussion, we have already returned to civil discourse. :beer: