Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Fingers crossed for tonight!!!!!
Hopefully NH happens in the next two years. With our state motto, we should have been the first New England State.
Good for the people who can medically use but I keep wondering about the overflow to the recreational users...that was my concern when voting on this.Passed in Mass
Good for the people who can medically use but I keep wondering about the overflow to the recreational users...that was my concern when voting on this.
Good for the people who can medically use but I keep wondering about the overflow to the recreational users...that was my concern when voting on this.
Good for the people who can medically use but I keep wondering about the overflow to the recreational users...that was my concern when voting on this.
Well I can't say people here in Washington are exactly jumping in the streets. There seems to be more of an attitude of, "we did what?! yesterday?", like a blackout from drinking the night before. Now the questions come.
-How do we as a state legally wrangle with DC?
-How do we educate people to the dangers of pot like with what's done with alcohol and tobacco?
-How do we test drivers accurately determining what constitutes impairment when no data exists due to the scheduled banning of the substance?
-How do we regulate the infrastructure from production to sale? How do we etc. etc. etc.
At least this showed the support and opened the discussion... REALLY opened the discussion. It'll be 30 days until being officially state legal. In that time the federal lawsuits will be filed to block the law and the highway money spigot will be shut off. God only knows what the weed growers in BC to he north and Humboldt County, CA to the south are strategizing right now. I'll bet its "stay the course, not much is gonna change."
As far as the general public is concerned, I think their attitude is "no thanks, I'd rather keep my job than get high." On the morning after, I sort of have a bad idea about this whole thing.
As far as the general public is concerned, I think their attitude is "no thanks, I'd rather keep my job than get high."
Yup, just like the general public has the attitude of "I'd rather keep my job than show up drunk at work. But in the privacy of my home at the end of the day...."
Well I can't say people here in Washington are exactly jumping in the streets. There seems to be more of an attitude of, "we did what?! yesterday?", like a blackout from drinking the night before. Now the questions come.
-How do we as a state legally wrangle with DC?
-How do we educate people to the dangers of pot like with what's done with alcohol and tobacco?
-How do we test drivers accurately determining what constitutes impairment when no data exists due to the scheduled banning of the substance?
-How do we regulate the infrastructure from production to sale? How do we etc. etc. etc.
At least this showed the support and opened the discussion... REALLY opened the discussion. It'll be 30 days until being officially state legal. In that time the federal lawsuits will be filed to block the law and the highway money spigot will be shut off. God only knows what the weed growers in BC to he north and Humboldt County, CA to the south are strategizing right now. I'll bet its "stay the course, not much is gonna change."
As far as the general public is concerned, I think their attitude is "no thanks, I'd rather keep my job than get high." On the morning after, I sort of have a bad idea about this whole thing.