Newpylong
Well-known member
Not taking a stance either way but the Marketing Director for Mount Snow posted a Peak press release denying the claims of majority ownership on their pass holder website.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Not taking a stance either way but the Marketing Director for Mount Snow posted a Peak press release denying the claims of majority ownership on their pass holder website.
Not taking a stance either way but the Marketing Director for Mount Snow posted a Peak press release denying the claims of majority ownership on their pass holder website.
I've been hoping this thread would just die.
Not taking a stance either way but the Marketing Director for Mount Snow posted a Peak press release denying the claims of majority ownership on their pass holder website.
Could you post a link? My search just turns up links reporting the majority ownership.
The details, are all spelled out in the 10Q SEC filing dated 12/12/18
He’s talking about a press release. That’s what I’d like to see.
Upon closing the Snow Time Acquisition, Cap 1 and its affiliates hold approximately 37.9% of the voting power of the Company
Assuming the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock and exercise of all warrants held by Cap 1 as of the Snow Time Acquisition closing, Cap 1 would own approximately 54% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
The distinction between a controlling interest and a substantial minority interest ought to be morally irrelevant to people who are concerned about this drug family making money off of Peaks. But I guess if you're Peaks you want to hope that those people don't realize it.
Hasnt the sackler family had a substantial minority share for years? Peaks must have tried real hard to keep this under the radar, Really does not matter, by next fall majority of people will have forgotten about it and everything will be normal by the time snowmaking starts up.
The distinction between a controlling interest and a substantial minority interest ought to be morally irrelevant to people who are concerned about this drug family making money off of Peaks. But I guess if you're Peaks you want to hope that those people don't realize it.
Not taking a stance either way but the Marketing Director for Mount Snow posted a Peak press release denying the claims of majority ownership on their pass holder website.
Went to a gender reveal party yesterday.
How does one access the passholder website?