Had a Peaks pass 6 out of last 7 years. Haven't heard about pass holders website
Sent from my XT1635-01 using AlpineZone mobile app
Sent from my XT1635-01 using AlpineZone mobile app
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Had a Peaks pass 6 out of last 7 years. Haven't heard about pass holders website
Had a Peaks pass 6 out of last 7 years. Haven't heard about pass holders website
Sent from my XT1635-01 using AlpineZone mobile app
Every time I hear this I think that some adult is having a party to now say they are the other sex.
Hasnt the sackler family had a substantial minority share for years? Peaks must have tried real hard to keep this under the radar, Really does not matter, by next fall majority of people will have forgotten about it and everything will be normal by the time snowmaking starts up.
Hasnt the sackler family had a substantial minority share for years? Peaks must have tried real hard to keep this under the radar
I work for Tufts Medical Center where Tufts University has the Sackler School of BioMedical Sciences... Built in the 80's by a 42M Sackler Family donation. Needless to say hundreds of Tufts Univ. & Tufts Med. Cntr. Faculty and employees are trying to press the university to remove the name....
That's not what it is?
Well stated.No; it's a stereotypically insipid millennial thing.
How exactly does a public company keep things that are publicly available as part of their SEC filings under the radar? The information was out there for anyone that bothered to look. The problem is that no one cared to look until someone in the media did the research and wrote a story about it. And yes, they purchased their initial 7% ownership stake back in 2015 that qualified them as "beneficial owners". And their name was in black and white in the SEC filing regarding "Statement of acquisition of beneficial ownership by individuals".
How many passholders do you really think look at SEC filings? Maybe .005%? This is news that they would have preferred to have stayed out of the light. If not for the media story it would have stayed out of the light and we wouldn't have 8 pages of discussion on it. Just because something is publicly available does not make it publicly known.
I agree with much of what you're saying. What I don't agree with is that they had to "try hard" to hide it. How many companies regularly issue press releases every time there's a stock transaction resulting in someone becoming a beneficial owner? So Peaks did nothing different than most other companies (that's my point). That people are too lazy to research a company and their ownership is not Peak's fault. That's a general problem with society. We don't care until someone else tells us to care. Ignorance is bliss!
I feel like if I was back there my greediness would win over my ethics. In a perfect world this company folds or gets out of nh...because they completely suck in nh. If I knew I could make an impact with that as a result I would jump in for a years or two....other than that wildcat is such a good hill to pass up
because they completely suck in nh.
Not an accurate statement, important to remember that crotched was defunct for over a decade with no hope of revival before peaks came to town. Today it has the best night skiing operation in northern New England and more importantly it is an excellent conduit for new skiers to fall in love with the sport. It offers cheap, local access for college students and excellent kids programs.
Does Peak publish an income statement broken down by ski area?