• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Park City/Talisker-Vail Lawsuit

trackbiker

Active member
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
364
Points
28
Location
Eastern PA
Back to the original topic.....Wasn't there supposed to be some type of ruling today on the lease bond? Tick...tick...tick....tick..
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,788
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,788
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
I'd call this a win for PCMR. They have some heat taken off them if they want to drag this out. The judge's decision may not speed up a resolution.

It is a Pyrrhic victory at best. They've lost the war. They might have one more season if they cough up the cash and in a short time. Otherwise they have to get off.
 

Highway Star

Active member
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
2,921
Points
36
FYI thats to be PAID in assurity bond or cash by NEXT FRIDAY...

to operate 15/16 season another $19 MIL has to be paid by march 2, 2015.

total to operate 2 seasons looks to be $36.5 mil...

This $36.5M figure compares directly to my guess of $200M to $300M Vail was asking for in their docs, actual $201M that Vail was asking for in their docs, $125M Vail asked for in court, and $1M to $7M POWDR asked for.
 

Highway Star

Active member
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
2,921
Points
36
It is a Pyrrhic victory at best. They've lost the war. They might have one more season if they cough up the cash and in a short time. Otherwise they have to get off.

They will likely operate the next two seasons, but at the end Vail will likely recover the bond amounts or more, and POWDR will be kicked out or pay rent over $10m per year. Pretty much worst case scenario IMHO, I'm not happy with how this effects Killington going forward.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,788
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
They will likely operate the next two seasons, but at the end Vail will likely recover the bond amounts or more, and POWDR will be kicked out or pay rent over $10m per year. Pretty much worst case scenario IMHO, I'm not happy with how this effects Killington going forward.

Good point. Killingtonians would prefer to see this end NOW before Killington revenues get sucked away to pay for this mess at PCMR. I imagine that they will impose a "legal fee surcharge" on their passes soon ;)
 

Highway Star

Active member
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
2,921
Points
36
Good point. Killingtonians would prefer to see this end NOW before Killington revenues get sucked away to pay for this mess at PCMR. I imagine that they will impose a "legal fee surcharge" on their passes soon ;)

John Cumming is like a black hole. Millions of dollars go to him every year. You can bet that any money funding this whole fiasco is going to come from what would normally be capital improvements at his resorts, and not his own personal profits.

Looking at Vail's reports is pretty insightful. While they may pay their executives and directors a few $100k each year, and stock dividends, they plow over $100M (half their profits) back into capital improvements to keep the machine going and their customers happy. At this point, POWDR's profits are going to Cumming, debt, Vail legal issues and then a small sliver for capital.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,788
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Well, I guess the TGR forum rumor of a deal turned out to be BS.

It's a case of Vail wanting too much money and Powdr wanting to pay too little....

Powdr had a hell of a deal--$150k annually for a lease of that size?!


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
I wonder why POWDR said that they would have to make a decision as to whether or not to post the bond. I thought if it was in that range they would have gladly posted it. Is business that bad because of this fiasco that they are actually worried about turning a profit even with the bond?
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,788
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
I wonder why POWDR said that they would have to make a decision as to whether or not to post the bond. I thought if it was in that range they would have gladly posted it. Is business that bad because of this fiasco that they are actually worried about turning a profit even with the bond?

I would not think that they would have $17.5 mill just lying around....

Also maybe they were waiting to see what the bond amount would be before trying to come to some kind of deal with Vail.


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 
Top