jimmywilson69
Well-known member
Wow! That's pretty cheap. I would have offered at least $200.
I was curious to what the going rate is. Although Vail had Cummings by the Balls...
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Wow! That's pretty cheap. I would have offered at least $200.
I seem to recall that Vail stated their legal fees were about $7 million when they made the bond request. Whether or not those fees were high, they are gong to be worth the investment. For PCMR that may be another story.i would love to know how much the Lawyers fees were for this... They are probably pissed that their billings will have an end in the foreseeable future.
My gut feeling is that each party is paying their own fees and that Vail accounted for this in the purchase price. Egos tend to get in the way of a different sort of resolution.Not sure if POWDR may have had to pay some or all of vail's legal fees
The announcement states that all litigation has been settled.Not sure if POWDR may have had to pay some or all of vail's legal fees
Trail boss, would you consider getting an epic local pass now because of this? Not sure if you've skied these resorts extensively.
Big Sky is going to have to change their "Biggest Skiing in America" marketing line.
Sometimes settlement includes an agreement to pay the other side's attorney's fees.The announcement states that all litigation has been settled.
Didn't read anything about that in the press release. Also didn't read anything about the profits Powdr made over the past few years since losing the lease. I take all litigation has been settled to mean they get to keep that too.Sometimes settlement includes an agreement to pay the other side's attorney's fees.