Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Scared the hell out of me, thought the headline was MRG. Sad to see it happen to anyone.
How so?That story was clickbait bullshit.
Not to diminish the loss, but UN KNEW they were misleading many people.
That story was clickbait bullshit.
Not to diminish the loss, but UN KNEW they were misleading many people.
That story was clickbait bullshit.
Not to diminish the loss, but UN KNEW they were misleading many people.
How so?
The name of the place is Mad River.
No... the name of the mountain is Mad River. There's a disclaimer at the bottom of the article explicitly saying [/B]This is not Mad River Glen!!!
I think Harvey is 100% correct. The headline writer most likely knew precisely what he was doing.
The journalistically responsible thing to do would be to put the state in the headline knowing full well that there are two resorts of the same name. But he also knew that the more famous MRG is about 18,000% more well-known is skiing circles and would get way more click/throughs, hence the intentionally ambiguous titling. EVERYTHING today in online content is all about the page hits. My 2¢.
How would you title the article?
"Ski Resort Lodge in Ohio that We Won't Name to Prevent Backlash from 2% of the Readers Burns to the Ground"
But wouldn't it be titled Mad River Glen if it was about MRG? I would venture to say that the more popular ski area in this case gets more of the clicks.
If the lodge at MRG in VT had caught fire, it would have made local NE television news before showing up on some obscure generic outdoorsy website.