What are you talking about? I established my position in my first post; there's nothing too defend. Fixed Grip Quad or High Speed Quad, the capacity is 2400 skiers per hour - uphill or downhill. What I said was trivial was how often the lift stops - you're argument, not mine. Arguing how often the fixed grip double on Madonna stops vs. how often the HSQ at Burke stops probably isn't going to yield conclusive results; metrics you brought up, not me.
I made a baseline, measurable comparison based on lift capacity. I admitted that there are other variables, but I don't think they are as extreme as you make them out to be. i.e. lift stoppages and people lapping the terrain quicker in "non-liftline" situations. In the latter, who cares if you're getting the same amount of runs/vertical in good snow over a period of five hours vs. eight hours?
And I don't get how you can "defend" the new HSQ at Burke, yet take such a hard line stance on maintaining the Fixed Grip Double on Madonna.
I made a baseline, measurable comparison based on lift capacity. I admitted that there are other variables, but I don't think they are as extreme as you make them out to be. i.e. lift stoppages and people lapping the terrain quicker in "non-liftline" situations. In the latter, who cares if you're getting the same amount of runs/vertical in good snow over a period of five hours vs. eight hours?
And I don't get how you can "defend" the new HSQ at Burke, yet take such a hard line stance on maintaining the Fixed Grip Double on Madonna.
Last edited: