Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
I have to believe they put up some surveillance cameras after the 1st incident. Does seem like an inside job (current or past employee). Strange stuff, for sure.
[/FONT]Kirby Brown said:[FONT="]"This individual has no regard for their own life and limb. They wanted to do what they did, they did it swiftly, they did it with skill."
https://lmgtfy.com/?q=Vail+1998+arsonunfamiliar with Vail in '98 do tell...
unfamiliar with Vail in '98 do tell...
As for the cause, it's mysterious. There are millions of causes. My first guess would have to be some sort of eco-terrorism, something like what happened at Vail in '98, especially considering the west coast is experiencing an environmental crisis with the wildfires.
Disgruntled employee?
I think their insurance company would INSIST on that going forward.One might think after the second cable cut the folks at Sea to Sky might pull the cabins off the line every night now moving forward.
I think their insurance company would INSIST on that going forward.
Would those car accidents have been the direct result of illegal sabotage? If not, then you are comparing apples to Guava fruit. I would think their insurance would be a bit more involved in the criminal investigation and prosecution this go around. The lift company did install high tech sensors and cameras after the rebuild (most likely required by the insurance carrier since the first event went unsolved). The only other thing they could really do differently this rebuild would be to remove cabins each night to preserve that part of the asset. But given this wasn't negligence on the operator's part, can't see them not being able to get insurance moving forward.How hard is it going to be for them to get coverage at this point? I don't know much about business insurance, but I'm pretty sure that I'd have a tough time getting car insurance with a pair of near-max-value claims in under 18 months.
How hard is it going to be for them to get coverage at this point? I don't know much about business insurance, but I'm pretty sure that I'd have a tough time getting car insurance with a pair of near-max-value claims in under 18 months.
Disgruntled employee? I understand this lift is not at Whistler ski area, but nearby.