Lostone
New member
Skiers and Riders Who Wear Helmets Still Die
Everyone dies. Nobody gets out of here alive.
Wearing a helmet might decrease the time you spend alive, as a vegetable. Worth the price.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Skiers and Riders Who Wear Helmets Still Die
I thought the following article from Maine was an interesting read. I don't want to start a long helmet thread but for you pro helmet fans that think Helmets are the ultimate in safety precautions making you and your children invincible, you may want to think again. Yes I agree helmets should be worn. But the value of wearing a helmet is not near as important as other safety precautions like taking ski or ride lessons and being in control at all times. IMHO of course.
Whenever an unfortunate death on the slopes occurs the first question is was a helmet worn. Much later you may hear questions like was everyone involved in the accident skiing/riding in control and did they take appropriate lessons recently.
http://morningsentinel.mainetoday.com/sports/stories/4681986.html
Quote from article:
"Don't wear a helmet" -- ? That's not at all what I'm saying.
What I'm saying is: Before you plunk down $100 for a helmet, know what you're getting. They provide a scoche head-injury insurance -- not a lot. They may present whiplash risks, especially for children. And they're a pain for rescuers to deal with if you do wipe out.
Put another way, skiers who wear helmets still die in mountain accidents. And so do people who don't.
How's this: Instead of the helmet, make a better investment, for the same price, in an advanced ski school lesson.
There is zero valid arguements that can be made against wearing a helmet and that's coming from someone who doesn't wear one. I know I have no excuse other than laziness in purchasing one.
There is zero valid arguements that can be made against wearing a helmet and that's coming from someone who doesn't wear one. I know I have no excuse other than laziness in purchasing one.
Well said!!!There is no downside, and it is also a good example for young children who most definitely should wear a helmet. Also anyone who skis or rides in the trees and does not wear a helmet is asking for trouble. Speed kills and helmets will not prevent all serious injuries or deaths, but wearing a helmet is the smart thing to do. I know from experience!
There is not much logic to this statement, IMO. One or two private ski lessons (price of an average helmet) will make a difference in your technique but will not make you such a better skier that you are immune from injury. Perhaps it will even instill false confidence due to increased ability level and lead to pushing boundaries that may increase risk of injury and perhaps a head injury during a fall because someone was pushing their new limits. All that is irrelevant as helmets help protect all skiers and riders of all ability levels from low speed head impacts. Yes, skiers who wear helmets still die. But advocating someone purchase lessons instead of buying a helmet? How about in addition to, and now you are talking.How's this: Instead of the helmet, make a better investment, for the same price, in an advanced ski school lesson.
Method9455, using your example, what if instead of the ski hitting you in the back of the head, the ski hit you in the neck under your chin and cut your carotid artery. You would have bleed out in seconds and that helmet would not have saved you one bit. What if the guy who fell and lost his skis took more lessons and never fell in the first place. Maybe more lessons and more emphasis on being in control would have a more positive outcome on overall ski industry safety.2) Fine you say, of course if you are in the park you need a helmet. But the other time a helmet saved my life I wasn't even moving. I was standing on the side of a trail out of the way, and an out of control skier had a yardsale. One ski came flying off and hit me in the back of the head, knocking me to the ground and causing a 1/4" x 3" dent in the helmet. The edge of the ski destroyed the helmet, I had a bit of whip lash, but I was ok. How many stiches would I have needed without a helmet? Would I even be alive?
No amount of lessons or prudence will ever protect you in case 2. (Forget that $100 worth of lessons is what, 2 hours? What can you learn in 2 hours?) I can handle any...........
Method9455, using your example, what if instead of the ski hitting you in the back of the head, the ski hit you in the neck under your chin and cut your carotid artery. You would have bleed out in seconds and that helmet would not have saved you one bit. What if the guy who fell and lost his skis took more lessons and never fell in the first place. Maybe more lessons and more emphasis on being in control would have a more positive outcome on overall ski industry safety.
It would seem that most people here believe that everyone wearing a helmet in a car should be mandatory but car driving lessons are optional. :blink:
![]()
Method9455, using your example, what if instead of the ski hitting you in the back of the head, the ski hit you in the neck under your chin and cut your carotid artery. You would have bleed out in seconds and that helmet would not have saved you one bit. What if the guy who fell and lost his skis took more lessons and never fell in the first place. Maybe more lessons and more emphasis on being in control would have a more positive outcome on overall ski industry safety.
It would seem that most people here believe that everyone wearing a helmet in a car should be mandatory but car driving lessons are optional. :blink:
![]()