bobbutts
New member
Scott from skivt-l is talking about some significant snows for N. VT
http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1012A&L=SKIVT-L&T=0&F=&S=&P=27715
http://list.uvm.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1012A&L=SKIVT-L&T=0&F=&S=&P=27715
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Looks like there's some coastal action on Sunday/Monday...but it may stay out ot sea.
Would you please explain what upslope snow is? dmc patiently explained last year, but I seem to have lost it. Sorry & Thanks.
Yep, you pretty much got it DrJeff! When you force air upwards against mountainsides, it cools...when it cools to saturation, it precipitates out or rains/snows. The more you force it upwards, the heavier the showers get.
You're hearing the "upslope" forecast a lot since we're getting into a persistent northwest flow the next several days which is prime (over the long haul) for northern resorts (especially NEK). We try to fine tune accumulations up a little more for N/NW facing slopes and lower end ranges for S/SE facing slopes in this particular pattern.
I've got it. Well, just a little bit. Is upslope snow independent of a storm snow? For example, we see this big honker of a system in the mid central states, barreling towards us. Is this considered up-slope snow, or just regular snow? Are not these large storm clouds fairly high in altitude so there's nothing "up" about it? Is up-slope only a "local" phenomena?
What mountains in the Northeast traditionally benefit from upslope snow? Let me guess, Jay, Bolton, maybe Stowe. All because of Champlain, right? What about Southern VT? NH?
So an upslope snow usually only benefits one side(s) of the hill, right? It's all dumped out before it gets to the top?
Champlain has minimal effect on NoVT snow, it is not wide enough to have dramatic impacts like the great lakes. Minimal, perhaps. Up slope doesn't need a catch, as far as I understand it, so the lake and upslope are not related.All because of Champlain, right? What about Southern VT? NH?
Champlain has minimal effect on NoVT snow, it is not wide enough to have dramatic impacts like the great lakes. Minimal, perhaps. Up slope doesn't need a catch, as far as I understand it, so the lake and upslope are not related.
Not really flat at all in NoNH. There are a crap ton of mountains all the way from the NoVT spine to the Presis. I think it is more the flatness hitting a wall than the lake. I read somewhere you needed a significantly fetch than Champlain provides to get lake effect (at least significant). The 100"+ difference between NoVT and NoNH isn't due to the lake.I wonder if there's a way to measure/quantify Lake Champlain's effect.
The Lake is 12 miles across at it's widest and it's probably only 30-40 miles between the Northern Greens and the Dacks. Yet, during that stretch systems load up and drop 100+ more inches of snow on the Northern Greens than the Dacks.
Then on the other side of the Greens, you've got an even wider swath of flat land (not as flat as the Champlain Valley, but still pretty flat) before it hits the Presidentials, yet save for Mt. Washington, they receive 100 + inches less than the Northern Greens.
Champlain has minimal effect on NoVT snow, it is not wide enough to have dramatic impacts like the great lakes. Minimal, perhaps. Up slope doesn't need a catch, as far as I understand it, so the lake and upslope are not related.
Just my non meteorlogical take on the northern greens vs the whites.
Greens get to squeeze out the last drops of moisture from moisture laden clouds that re-form just after the dacs and then hit the northern greens where they finally meet their demise. Also doesn't lake Champlain freeze over?
Relevant link from Ski the East:
http://www.skitheeast.net/blogs/bd/...-Kooks-.DSH.-Northwest-Flow-and-Upslope-Snow/