• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

skinning Mt Ellen

ts01

New member
Joined
Jun 2, 2004
Messages
179
Points
0
Location
NY burbs
Now that lifts have closed, what is the policy (if any) on skinning or hiking up Mt Ellen?

Worth the effort next week midweek? I.e., decent skiing to be had?

We'll be riding the lifts at Lincoln Peak for a couple of days but this could be a fun adventure.

Thanks. Pls PM if you'd rather not post.
 
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
17,569
Points
0
you're allowed because it's on National Forest service land..I hiked Sugarbush north/Mount Ellen back in college..not a bad hike due to lots of zigzaggy Blue trails to get you to the summit..post a photo TR for stoke!!!!
 

ts01

New member
Joined
Jun 2, 2004
Messages
179
Points
0
Location
NY burbs
Thanks GSS.

I'd be interested to hear from any Sugarbush locals what to expect on the downhill. Recent photos before they closed look good. Our choice is basically between skinning up Mt Ellen, riding the lifts a 3d day at Lincoln, or at Mad River if they're still open (looks dicey). Skinning would be new to us but this seems like like a great place to try it out.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,499
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
you're allowed because it's on National Forest service land..

Wrong. Most of Ellen lies on private land. Only the summit area is in the GMNF (a small triangle that runs off the summit, down Rim Run to the North Ridge Express summit terminal area, and south along Rim Run).

Lincoln Peak, on the other hand, lies mainly in the GMNF with only portions of the base area being private.

Even if Ellen was public land, IIRC the way the lease reads SB can restrict access to those who pay to use the ski trails and the "services" they provide (snowmaking, grooming).

I think we've had this discussion before :blink:
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,499
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
OK, sorry for my fail at searching.

No fail at all. It is just a perennial topic of conversation and IIRC I had the same discussion regarding ME NOT being on GMNF land with GSS before.
 
Last edited:

BushMogulMaster

Industry Rep
Industry Rep
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
1,815
Points
48
Location
Leadville, CO
There is a map somewhere in the public domain that shows you the actual line (it's in the Act 250 database somewhere). But it's only 58.8 acres of USFS on the Summit of Ellen. The remaining acreage is all private dirt, and should be treated as such.

As TB mentioned, the special use permit (I believe they actually call them "Ski Area Permits" now) gives Summit Ventures the latitude to restrict access to the property, even if it is "public." If they say no hiking at Mt. Ellen, it is trespassing. If they say no hiking at Lincoln Peak, that is within the legal structure of their USFS permit.
 
Last edited:

BushMogulMaster

Industry Rep
Industry Rep
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
1,815
Points
48
Location
Leadville, CO
So JD was tresspassing???

tres⋅pass
   /ˈtrɛspəs, -pæs/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [tres-puhs, -pas] Show IPA
–noun
1. Law.
>a. an unlawful act causing injury to the person, property, or rights of another, committed with force or violence, actual or implied.
>b. a wrongful entry upon the lands of another.
>c. the action to recover damages for such an injury.
2. an encroachment or intrusion.
3. an offense, sin, or wrong.

Yes. See 1b and 2.
 

BushMogulMaster

Industry Rep
Industry Rep
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
1,815
Points
48
Location
Leadville, CO
Additional clarification on trespassing:

http://www.enotes.com/everyday-law-encyclopedia/trespassing said:
Trespassing is a legal term that can refer to a wide variety of offenses against a person or against property. Trespassing as it relates to real estate law means entering onto land without consent of the landowner. There are both criminal and civil TRESPASS laws. Criminal trespass law is enforced by police, sheriffs, or park rangers. Civil trespass requires that the landowner initiate a private enforcement action in court to collect any damages for which the trespasser may be responsible, regardless of whether a crime has been committed. Traditionally, for either type of trespass, some level of intent is required. Thus, the trespasser must not simply unwittingly traverse another's land but must knowingly go onto the property without permission. Knowledge may be inferred when the owner tells the trespasser not to go on the land, when the land is fenced, or when a "no trespassing" sign in posted.
 

BushMogulMaster

Industry Rep
Industry Rep
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
1,815
Points
48
Location
Leadville, CO
Well, 1b seems contradictory since other in this case is the public.

No, Andy. Mt. Ellen is private dirt. That's where JD was skinning and skiing, and is the area in question for this thread. Regardless, the USFS permit gives the company the right to restrict access to Lincoln Peak's public ground as well.
 

atkinson

New member
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
190
Points
0
Website
www.sugarbush.com
A little clarification ...

The VP of Mtn Ops said that hiking at Mount Ellen is fine, just don't bring skis, boards or sleds. Presumably snowshoes, as long as they are not too slippery, should be fine.

John
 

andyzee

New member
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
10,884
Points
0
Location
Home
Website
www.nsmountainsports.com
The real question is, Isn't that just plain wrong? Public land that limits public access. What is the duration of Sugarbush's lease? Is it just ski season or throughout the year?
 

bvibert

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
30,394
Points
38
Location
Torrington, CT
The real question is, Isn't that just plain wrong? Public land that limits public access. What is the duration of Sugarbush's lease? Is it just ski season or throughout the year?

The whole right or wrong to be blocking access on leased public land thing has been beaten to death here in the past. Regardless, that's the way the lease is written. In this case it's irrelevant since most of Ellen, except for the summit, is private land.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,499
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
The real question is, Isn't that just plain wrong? Public land that limits public access. What is the duration of Sugarbush's lease? Is it just ski season or throughout the year?

For Mount Ellen you can access the 58 acres of summit area public land via the Long Trail or Jerusalem Trail.

For Lincoln Peak: SB leases the land. They have a special use permit with the GMNF and, in essence, have converted that portion of the GMNF to private land under that permit.
 

BushMogulMaster

Industry Rep
Industry Rep
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
1,815
Points
48
Location
Leadville, CO
For Mount Ellen you can access the 58 acres of summit area public land via the Long Trail or Jerusalem Trail.

For Lincoln Peak: SB leases the land. They have a special use permit with the GMNF and, in essence, have converted that portion of the GMNF to private land under that permit.

The public acreage at Mt Ellen is operated under the same terms/permitting as Lincoln Peak, so the same concept applies.
 
Top