jaytrem
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,247
- Points
- 113
Yey these days they build jumps that will send you into the stratosphere and rails that will crack a bone like it's nothing.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
You think this because you usually ski at vail owned resorts.
Based on personal experience, it's a local management decision. Not corporate. That being said, this is a Killington threadIs it Vail policy to be conservative with rope drops?
I canβt speak to other resorts, but Whistler is extremely liberal, especially in the early season, but that could be due to differences in provincial and federal law.
Agree, but my point is that it is an industry-wide issue: not something specific to any independent area or corporate entity.Guessing the much more litigious society we live in now vs many decades ago, has much to do with what at times may seem like being very conservative with rope drops
Didnβt say they did. I said you were use to vail and them not opening questionable trails but others do more liberally.Last time I checked, Vail did not own Killington.
While I'm sure that risk mitigation and liability plays into many (or all) operational decisions, I'd put improvements in snowmaking and grooming in for a mention as a significant influence. Skiers and riders have much higher expectations now than they did years ago for snow surface, and while many of us are more annoyed by what we feel are overly aggressive closures, there are also plenty of skiers out there who get just as annoyed at aggressive openings.Guessing the much more litigenous society we live in now vs many decades ago, has much to do with what at times may seem like being very conservative with rope drops
I'm not sure who owns the other end, but I wouldn't be surprised if it were somewhere Epic.
I suspect it is made a lot by people like us or patrollers more than actual litigators who I doubt are in the room with any frequency. I have asked a few litigators and none really buy natural hazards can be legal liabilities stuff.While I'm sure that risk mitigation and liability plays into many (or all) operational decisions, I'd put improvements in snowmaking and grooming in for a mention as a significant influence. Skiers and riders have much higher expectations now than they did years ago for snow surface, and while many of us are more annoyed by what we feel are overly aggressive closures, there are also plenty of skiers out there who get just as annoyed at aggressive openings.
Will be there tomorrow. Canyon should be open as well todaySuperstar Six just had its grand opening about 15 minutes ago!
not liking how popular skiing's getting, at all
Oh, those were the days. That era was what led, in part, to where we are today with EPIC and IKON.I guess you never skiied K during the ASC bronze pass days.
I recall K being just as much of a zoo in 1990 on weekends as the ASC days. Actually, it was a bit worse back then as there was only 1 true high speed lift (SS) and so every lift and pod was jammed.Oh, those were the days. That era was what led, in part, to where we are today with EPIC and IKON.
We keep witchin' n' bitchin' but most on Epic/Ikon are skiing more places far cheaper than the 90's.I recall K being just as much of a zoo in 1990 on weekends as the ASC days. Actually, it was a bit worse back then as there was only 1 true high speed lift (SS) and so every lift and pod was jammed.
You're thinking too far back Doc. ASC didn't exist in the late 80's, early 90's. That was still S-K-I days at Killington (and Mount Snow too). LBO only had SR in the 80's/earliest 90's, then created LBO Holdings with just Attitash somewhere around 92ish I think? ASC was still several years away.In their heyday back in the late 80's/early 90's when the ASC Passes were very cheap and prevalent, if I remember correctly K had some years where they would draw about 1,000,000 visitors over the course of the season. Nowadays, if I understand it correctly, their annual attendance numbers are 70% +/- a little bit of those peak numbers (and the K regulars can 100% feel free to correct me with those numbers!!!) So while they still draw more than any other resort on the East Coast, they are much less than their really big number years, and have also improved over their early Powdr days when if I remember correctly their annual attendance bottomed out in the modern era at around 600k visitors.
The lift system that K has today vs back when they had those peak attendance numbers, also makes moving the masses around the mountain easier and more efficient now, even if they do have less acres and lifts than they did back then
Very likely. Add in a few decades of time, and that entire morphing of SKI-LBO and then eventually into ASC and then onto the various other break ups and ownerships after ASC crashed and burned, gets a bit blury as to who was owned by who, when!You're thinking too far back Doc. ASC didn't exist in the late 80's, early 90's. That was still S-K-I days at Killington (and Mount Snow too). LBO only had SR in the 80's/earliest 90's, then created LBO Holdings with just Attitash somewhere around 92ish I think? ASC was still several years away.