• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Marker Griffon, Jester, Baron, Duke question.

wa-loaf

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
15,109
Points
48
Location
Mordor
I'm trying to decide if it's worth the dough to get one of these for my Wateas.

Anyone have firsthand experience on the same ski with regular bindings vs that ski with the Marker wide ski bindings?
 

Philpug

New member
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
1,589
Points
0
Yeah. I had 888's with and without Jesters (Tyrolia 12DIN were the other bindings). Laterally the JEsters are more powerful, especially if you are going to be skiing the ski on hardpack. I cannot help with the Duke/Barons. Are they stiffer than a PX18 or 916? Not sure, but they will be lighter.
 

Hawkshot99

Active member
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
4,489
Points
36
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY
I own a pair of Scott P3's with a Griffon on them. Last year i had the same model ski, but with a Rossi Axial setup. The ski is 82 mm under foot for comparison, dont know what yours are. The Markers are easier to get the skis up on edge when skiing hard pack with them. How much easier? That is debatable, but it is still easier. They were also WAY lighter than last years setup.

I have Dukes on my B-Squads (100mm). They are the only ski over 90mm that I have skied, so I dont have much to compare them to. However they are able to get up on edge and get from side to side very easy.
 

wa-loaf

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
15,109
Points
48
Location
Mordor
Just ordered the Dukes from backcountry.com :smash:

Just on the 5% chance I might do some backcountry ...
 

Trekchick

Active member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
3,131
Points
36
Location
Reno - North Lake Tahoe
The only thing that is not ideal with the duke is the zero delta.
I have the duke on my Bros which is fine, I have griffons for my Kiku's. A friend has Jesters on his Watea 94's. Great binding set up!
 

wa-loaf

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
15,109
Points
48
Location
Mordor
The only thing that is not ideal with the duke is the zero delta.
I have the duke on my Bros which is fine, I have griffons for my Kiku's. A friend has Jesters on his Watea 94's. Great binding set up!

What do you mean by zero delta?
 

bvibert

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
30,394
Points
38
Location
Torrington, CT
Apparently the dukes have no lift in the heel compared to the toe, where as most alpine bindings have 4-8mm of delta. I guess it can make it hard to stay out of the backseat.
 

Trekchick

Active member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
3,131
Points
36
Location
Reno - North Lake Tahoe
Apparently the dukes have no lift in the heel compared to the toe, where as most alpine bindings have 4-8mm of delta. I guess it can make it hard to stay out of the backseat.
This is what I mean. :)

Its not super hard to stay out of the back seat, but it is something you want to be conscious of.
Still a great binding!
 

tjf67

New member
Joined
Sep 26, 2006
Messages
2,218
Points
0
Location
L.P.
Just ordered the Dukes from backcountry.com :smash:

Just on the 5% chance I might do some backcountry ...



NICE I have been using the Dukes for two years and have no complaints. I dont know what a delta is but I dont notice any difference from a regular binding.
 

bigbog

Active member
Joined
Feb 17, 2004
Messages
4,882
Points
38
Location
Bangor and the state's woodlands
A mutant who's happy near zero(Flat)!...speaks

With limited dorsiflexion, lots of ramp = the_backseat + balance issues...especially with the built in system-bindings...but you can compensate via toe shims..etc.
$.01
 
Top