SkiDork
New member
I can't believe they actually got this video. Awesome.
http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/04/11/new.york.plane.incident/index.html?iref=NS1#
http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/04/11/new.york.plane.incident/index.html?iref=NS1#
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
The upper gangway is to cut turnaround time, shaves 22 minutes. Not as big a deal on long haul flights, but you get a couple A380s a day and that's an extra gate opening for a single aisle.Our gate was near one when i was in Dubai - they had to build a special gangway because it's dual leveled.. And that's how they do stuff in Dubai...
I was in a 777 I think and it was dwarfed in height...
It's because it is square. Has to fit in a 80mx80m box for ground operations, the length of the A380-800 is 74m - about the same as a 747. If they ever build a -900, it will be 79m, same as the wingspan. Fuselage height/length on the 380 is about 8.7, on the A320 it's 10.2. Notable visual difference.I know its big, but I still prefer the 74. It has more character. The 380 is too squarish looking somehow...
I think the bigger plane wasn't the sole guilty party.
Air-France plane was on the right-of-way avenue...what is the smaller plane doing crowding?....much like a car @stop-sign, sticking out 10' into a 40mph highway. Those big things don't stop on a dime. They're the plane that had the right-of-way. They should've been told to ride the righthand side by tower. Not using that airport's runways on a regular basis...tower should've told taxiing planes to back off before entering...imho.
Really, because of lack of size design it should've been the tower's call, knowing that the Air-France's dimensions was never imagined at time of runway layout.
One out-of-control ego = potential for disaster....
The upper gangway is to cut turnaround time, shaves 22 minutes. Not as big a deal on long haul flights, but you get a couple A380s a day and that's an extra gate opening for a single aisle.
It's because it is square. Has to fit in a 80mx80m box for ground operations, the length of the A380-800 is 74m - about the same as a 747. If they ever build a -900, it will be 79m, same as the wingspan. Fuselage height/length on the 380 is about 8.7, on the A320 it's 10.2. Notable visual difference.
Not that big a fan of it myself. Other than the size, there's nothing really special about it. Just a typical new aircraft. No real gamechanging design aspects. I do find the wings on the ground to be very aesthetic, though.
![]()
Actually AF did not have the right of way, the small jet was stopped waiting to be marshalled into the gate. When I'm taxiing and I see a plane stopped and waiting for a gate I will stop unless I'm sure that my wingtip will clear the other aircraft. Also it looks like AF was taxiing too fast that close to the terminal. You taxi at a speed that you will be able to stop if anything obstructs your taxi.
I know its big, but I still prefer the 74. It has more character. The 380 is too squarish looking somehow...
But they are Piiiiiiiiiiiiiiimp on the inside...
I bet. I've never had the privilege of going upstairs on a 74. Probably never even ride in a 380
I rode in the upper deck of a 747 from Tokyo to Taipei. It was coach but there was a ton of room! Nice bin to stash my stuff by the windows... 2 flight attendants for maybe 20 people...
My buddy takes the 380s to Dubai all the time now... Loves them - business class is PIMP!!
Even coach is nice.. Emirates does a great job - one of my favorites..
My flight on Emirates on a 777 was one of the nicest long hauls i ever did.. Ambian helped... haha..
Probably the nicest flight I ever took was JFK to Frankfurt on Lufthansa (to pick up Ally from Russia). Alitalia was also nice. American carriers just don't do it as nice as foreign ones. I hear Pac basin are the best.