Perhaps he goes for the atmosphere, friends, etc.
There is something to be said for a comfortable environment.
I get that.
I tend to be very loyal to places as well.
and Blue Moon sux :razz:
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Perhaps he goes for the atmosphere, friends, etc.
There is something to be said for a comfortable environment.
Like waterskiing at dawn, sking down a 5 acre powder filled bowl has to be experienced to be appreciated. If you have never felt the zero G entry off the cornice, the fluid immersion of skis planing as they accelerate, the limitless expanse beneath you, the speed tugging at every part of you that is within the snow, and the feeling of skiing the pressure balance instead of the surface, then you will continue to think that open areas are over rated.
I have trouble believing that any ski area in the east could ever offer that type experience giving the wet snow and rain we have to deal with here, let alone the higher skier density and environmental issues.
On the subject of why some older trails are so wide -
Back when skiing was dominated by the Austrians there were two kinds of areas to ski at a resort. Trails were long narrow paths from the top that were meandering adventures down the mountain. Slopes were wide blue and green pitch fields where Austrian Instructors would drill you on traversing and step turning. Come ski our wide slopes was the clarion call to skiers who wanted to emulate the Austrian above treeline style of skiing. Many of those slopes still exist today. This is not the same thing as the wide machine groomed boulevardes like Superstar, Outer Limits, and Double Dipper at Killington that were made for the masses, not the Austrians.
Looks like you caught a good game. Did you get to see Dougie play before he got shipped back to Juniors?
and Blue Moon sux :razz:
Not sure why you feel the need to dismiss my preference by writing like you know what I've experienced and how it made me feel better than I do.
It's ok if you want to disagree, but please try not to make assumptions about me.
I was stating my preference as well.
What you said was
"open areas are overrated ", which implies overrated by someone else, like me perhaps. Your statement dismissed my preference.
Et tu bobbutts?
I'm glad you've had great days in the East and it sucks that out west you've had bad luck, but I assume your post isn't meant to convey the idea that the East is better than the West. Because it's not even close, as I'm sure you know.
I have been out West twice, thank you very much.
(The above comment is made in jest.)
Do the Alps compare to out West. How about Alaska?
Smellytele I am saying the reason you have had more good days in the east on the average is because you live here, and therefore hit the better days here. BTW)
The West is a million times better than the East. You crazy if you think otherwise.
I get that.
I tend to be very loyal to places as well.
and Blue Moon sux :razz:
1,000,000 x REALLY ??...
One... Hundred... BILLION times better
Or a kajillion bajillion times better
Are you a McIntire passholder?
I always wanted to live in a ski town when I was growing up. Too bad I wound up in ManchVegas, probably the worst ski town. At least its not far from the mega resorts - Pats Peak and Crotched Mountain.
Well, at least you have McIntire and the Uke close by.:flag:
I always wanted to live in a ski town when I was growing up. Too bad I wound up in ManchVegas, probably the worst ski town. At least its not far from the mega resorts - Pats Peak and Crotched Mountain.
You left out the bowl skiing at the local institution. The mighty Nashoba! 20 minutes for, but still not worth it.
I am hearing that they will be seeding some bumps!
![]()
Never been there!