• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Big Burke announcement

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,552
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
The only other condos I know of belong to a small place in St. Johnsbury, so the county data really is Burke data.


.
 

halfpintvt

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
110
Points
0
Location
NEK Vermont
I am very familiar with property in Burke and I do not know of any property that has had it value raised every year without some sort of improvement or a rolling reappraisal. The State of Vermont does not allow listers to do this. Tax rates have certainly changed in the 17+ years from 1997 to now but I cannot think of any property in Burke that has had it's assessment raised every year except 2009 . The only exception I can think of would be if a parcel is in current use. That could change the taxable land value from year to year. Is your property in current use?
 

ablb

New member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
58
Points
0
My property is a condo at Burke and I'd be happy to show you my tax bills.
 

halfpintvt

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
110
Points
0
Location
NEK Vermont
Burke does not re-assess property every year. The Tax Rate can certainly change from one year to the next ($1.98 per hundred one year and $2.05 per hundred another year) but the value of the property does not change every year. Burke had a Town Wide reapprisal in 2006 and another Town Wide Reappraisal this year. In other years there have been rolling reappraisals in certain areas which have resulted in assessment changes, some up and some down. Vermont State law does not allow a town to change property values simply to raise more money that is why tax rates change from year to year. Values stay the same for several years at a time (barring improvements ) but tax rates go up so the tax bill is greater.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,552
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
An interesting tidbit from the latest VT Digger article. The Q Burke hotel will be paid for with $120 million in EB-5 money. Out of the 240 EB-5 investors (at $500,000 a piece), only 66 investors have subscribed.

Where is the money coming from to build out the hotel if they are 174 EB-5 investors short?

And by the way, now that we know that only 66 investors have subscribed, my guess as to the number of investors made a couple of months back was almost spot on. It turns out that my gut was absolutely correct.
 

Masskier

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
721
Points
0
Location
South of Boston, Burke Mt VT
In light of the condo valuation talk, I thought that I would take a look at the Vermont Realtors Association Report for May. Year to date, only one condo has sold. That compares to six for the same period last year. Number of days on the market until sale has gone up by 87%. Pending sales are down 85%.

Some additional stats,

There were 5 sales, not 1.


The mean price went from $250,583 to $478,200, a 92% increase and the median price went from $240,000 to $509,000 a 112% increase, during the same time period. This is also the reason why assess values are going up. Even though it was 10 years since the last town wide re-appraisal, it was the past 12-18 months that there was a “pop” in the values.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,270
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
An interesting tidbit from the latest VT Digger article. The Q Burke hotel will be paid for with $120 million in EB-5 money. Out of the 240 EB-5 investors (at $500,000 a piece), only 66 investors have subscribed.

Where is the money coming from to build out the hotel if they are 174 EB-5 investors short?

And by the way, now that we know that only 66 investors have subscribed, my guess as to the number of investors made a couple of months back was almost spot on. It turns out that my gut was absolutely correct.

That's odd


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,552
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
Some additional stats,

There were 5 sales, not 1.


The mean price went from $250,583 to $478,200, a 92% increase and the median price went from $240,000 to $509,000 a 112% increase, during the same time period. This is also the reason why assess values are going up. Even though it was 10 years since the last town wide re-appraisal, it was the past 12-18 months that there was a “pop” in the values.

That's odd. The realtors association says prices are lower. Why are they missing data?


.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,107
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
An interesting tidbit from the latest VT Digger article. The Q Burke hotel will be paid for with $120 million in EB-5 money. Out of the 240 EB-5 investors (at $500,000 a piece), only 66 investors have subscribed.

Where is the money coming from to build out the hotel if they are 174 EB-5 investors short?

I wondered the same thing. My eyes nearly popped out of my head when I read that!

They've only netted $33M of the $120M sum, which is a mere 28%! :eek:

If this hotel complex is even REMOTELY close to completion, that either means that the $120M estimate is completely fictitious b******t, or the company is dipping into its' piggy-bank rather than using EB-5 money.


EDIT: The above would be a really good question for Vermont Digger to explore. Wouldn't it be "interesting" if Jay Peak co's project estimates were often wildly overstated to the upside, while simultaneously fully EB-5 subscribed. Gosh, that would really be something were that the case. Of course, you'd need to be able to fully look into their financials to know whether that's the case or not. Hmmm......
 
Last edited:

mbedle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,764
Points
48
Location
Barto, Pennsylvania
It is important to remember that this EB-5 project includes more then just the hotel and conference center. According to the Resort's March 2014 Business Plan, the total cost of the project is 104.7 million with only 98 million coming from EB-5 investors. The rest is coming from the resort owners. Not sure where the 120M number is coming from, there may be more updated docs on this project.

In the business plan, the hotel and conference center buildout is estimated to cost $48,695,000 EB-5 money and $3,155,000 resort owner money. The Tennis facility, aquatic center and mountain bike park will cost an additional $26,950,000 EB-5 money and $775,000 resort owner money. The remainder of the money consists of utilities & common area infrastructure ($3.3 M EB-5 and 1.4 M resort owner), construction supervision (11.3 M EB-5), Contingencies (3.7 M EB-5), hotel architect & design fees (1.4 M EB-5) and Land (2.5 M EB-5 and 1.4 resort owner).
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,552
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
Good point. The contractor estimated the cost of the hotel to be $55 million. So they are $22 million short if you don't include the 10% management fee.
 

mbedle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,764
Points
48
Location
Barto, Pennsylvania
Agreed, but I am not sure where Vtdigger is getting their numbers and how accurate they are. I have yet to find anywhere online that shows the actual number of committed investors. We also need to assume that the number changes from day to day.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,552
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
VTDigger gets their information from FOIA requests.

Any bets on the likelihood that the aquatic centers gets built?

Any bets on the likelihood that the crater in Newport gets a building constructed on top of it?
 

River19

New member
Joined
Jan 12, 2015
Messages
552
Points
0
The fact that the Qs, Stenger and the 3rd guy are principals in "dozens of companies" combined with the nature of the Phase II complaints feels very ponzi-ish to me. I hope I'm wrong.......

So let's say they come up short on funding for the Tennis. Swimming etc. build outs but cobble together funding to complete the hotel and snow making investments/build, I think the consensus would be that the mountain "resort" is in a better place than before right?

I'm trying to find the silver lining in the fact that this whole EB-5/Stenger/Q mess feels very shady.......I'm waiting for the announcement that Bernie Madoff has been hired on as a consultant to ANC/Q/Jay
 

mbedle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,764
Points
48
Location
Barto, Pennsylvania
VTDigger gets their information from FOIA requests.

Any bets on the likelihood that the aquatic centers gets built?

Any bets on the likelihood that the crater in Newport gets a building constructed on top of it?

FOIA requests are only as good as the data they provide. I have no idea have fast the investor data is updated on the government level (I would think pretty slow). So if the resort is not updating the government with their current investor amounts on regular intervals, the FOIA request don't necessarily reflect the actual numbers.

As far as the aquatic center and tennis facilities, I would guess they won't get built until they can prove the hotel is financially stable (although the three are tied together). Based on the report I read, the profitability of the hotel is projected to be significant because it will operate under no immediate debt. Another thing I noted in the report is mentioning of an indoor biking facility! Link to the report is below:

https://eb5projects.com/system/proj...original/Q_Burke_Business_Plan.pdf?1395475107
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,552
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
FOIA requests are only as good as the data they provide.
Oh, please. As for the number of investors is concerned, a reasonable person would give weight to the FOIA documents. I'm willing to listen if you have a better source of data, but so far I haven't seen it.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,552
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
As far as the aquatic center and tennis facilities, I would guess they won't get built until they can prove the hotel is financially stable (although the three are tied together). Based on the report I read, the profitability of the hotel is projected to be significant because it will operate under no immediate debt.
You seriously believe that they will be able to get future EB-5 investors for these projects? Even after all of this negative publicity? There is a reason that there is no activity at the AnC Bio site even though there was a "groundbreaking" in May.
 
Top