• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Accuweather Winter Forecast Released

Zand

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2003
Messages
4,389
Points
113
Location
Spencer, MA
City, State, 05 Temp, Normal Temp, Temp Depart., 05 Snow, Normal Snow, Snow Depart.

ALBANY, NY 26.88 29.88 -3 80 64 16
BINGHAMTON, NY 26.08 28.58 -2.5 106 84 22
BLOCK IS., RI 32.2 35.2 -3 26 21 6
BLUE HILL, MA 29.72 32.72 -3 76 60 16
BOSTON, MA 32.88 35.88 -3 53 42 11
BRIDGEPORT, CT 33.3 36.3 -3 35 26 9
BUFFALO, NY 29.44 30.94 -1.5 103 94 9
BURLINGTON, VT 23.1 26.1 -3 99 79 20
CARIBOU, ME 15.82 18.82 -3 129 112 17
CONCORD, NH 25.04 28.04 -3 80 64 16
HARTFORD, CT 30.02 33.02 -3 64 49 15
MT. WASHINGTON, NH 8.22 11.22 -3 326 261 65
NEW YORK CITY 41.72 38.72 3 36 28 8
PORTLAND, ME 26.22 29.22 -3 88 70 18
PROVIDENCE, RI 49.96 52.96 -3 45 36 10
ROCHESTER, NY 28.48 30.48 -2 107 92 15
SYRACUSE, NY 27.82 29.82 -2 139 116 23
WORCESTER, MA 27.48 30.48 -3 85 68 17

Those are just eastern cities. You can view all of them on accuweather.com. For the west, they're saying way less snow than normal. Hell, Denver picked up 1/3 of their forecast today.
 

Strat

New member
Joined
Jun 14, 2005
Messages
197
Points
0
Location
Mad River Valley, Vermont
Website
www.geocities.com
Too many numbers... I prefer graphics

winter.gif


:D :D :D :D :D
 

ctenidae

Active member
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
8,959
Points
38
Location
SW Connecticut
I do like it that Accuweather and The Old Farmer's Almanac are in agreement.

Makes me wonder what all those sattelites adn computers are for, though...
 

loafer89

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
3,978
Points
0
Location
Enfield, C.T
I'll get excited when I see NOAA's winter outlook. Hopefully there will not be a repeat of last year when most of New England's heavy snow fell at the coast and missed the mountains :x
 

awf170

New member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
4,380
Points
0
Location
Lynn and Lowell MA
Zand said:
City, State, 05 Temp, Normal Temp, Temp Depart., 05 Snow, Normal Snow, Snow Depart.

ALBANY, NY 26.88 29.88 -3 80 64 16
BINGHAMTON, NY 26.08 28.58 -2.5 106 84 22
BLOCK IS., RI 32.2 35.2 -3 26 21 6
BLUE HILL, MA 29.72 32.72 -3 76 60 16
BOSTON, MA 32.88 35.88 -3 53 42 11
BRIDGEPORT, CT 33.3 36.3 -3 35 26 9
BUFFALO, NY 29.44 30.94 -1.5 103 94 9
BURLINGTON, VT 23.1 26.1 -3 99 79 20
CARIBOU, ME 15.82 18.82 -3 129 112 17
CONCORD, NH 25.04 28.04 -3 80 64 16
HARTFORD, CT 30.02 33.02 -3 64 49 15
MT. WASHINGTON, NH 8.22 11.22 -3 326 261 65
NEW YORK CITY 41.72 38.72 3 36 28 8
PORTLAND, ME 26.22 29.22 -3 88 70 18
PROVIDENCE, RI 49.96 52.96 -3 45 36 10
ROCHESTER, NY 28.48 30.48 -2 107 92 15
SYRACUSE, NY 27.82 29.82 -2 139 116 23
WORCESTER, MA 27.48 30.48 -3 85 68 17

Those are just eastern cities. You can view all of them on accuweather.com. For the west, they're saying way less snow than normal. Hell, Denver picked up 1/3 of their forecast today.

what is this supposed to be telling us... that it will be the same exact weather as last year :-?
 

Zand

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2003
Messages
4,389
Points
113
Location
Spencer, MA
05 temp as in 05-06. :roll:

And I love the way it shows 50-75% of normal snowfall for Florida. "Instead of 10 flakes, you'll get 6 this year."
 

Zand

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2003
Messages
4,389
Points
113
Location
Spencer, MA
fwiw? There's one I don't know. :oops:

As for the '05-'06, that's what I got off accuweather just before they put it in chart form like it is now. I figured all of you would be able to figure it out. Sorry about the confusion.
 

Joshua

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2002
Messages
400
Points
18
Location
Connecticut
as far as I can tell Accuweather only based their forecast on the Hurricane season....

NOAA will be interesting to compare...

10 days forecast remains warm right now (50's or higher), and 10-16 stays warm through the beginning of november
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,124
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
And these facts, nice maps, etc. are brought to you by your favorite New England Ski Area, which says, "buy passes now," and by, Rick Santourum, proud sponsor of Crap-u-weather! :lol: :lol:
 

ctenidae

Active member
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
8,959
Points
38
Location
SW Connecticut
NOAA's forecast a couple of weeks ago was warmer adnd dryer than usual, but that forecast was a month or more old. Not to be a downer, but that's what it was. Likely it will change.
 

Marc

New member
Joined
Sep 12, 2005
Messages
7,526
Points
0
Location
Dudley, MA
Website
www.marcpmc.com
And we should all take pause and realize that more than one meteorologist one more than one separate occasion has told me New England, as a region, is easily the hardest to forcast weather for in all of North America, and high in the running for hardest in the world.


The weather will be what it will, no matter what our forcasters tell us now. Just like any other year, we will suck it up and enjoy it, because damnit, that's what being a New England skier is all about.


The rest of New England can be bitter like they normally are.
 

dmc

New member
Joined
Oct 28, 2004
Messages
14,275
Points
0
Marc said:
The weather will be what it will, no matter what our forcasters tell us now. Just like any other year, we will suck it up and enjoy it, because damnit, that's what being a New England skier is all about.

Last year I was skiing in New England...
Man - it snowed then sleeted - then the wind kicked up - then it rain - then it turned back to snow...

........and then in the next 5 minutes........
 

Marc

New member
Joined
Sep 12, 2005
Messages
7,526
Points
0
Location
Dudley, MA
Website
www.marcpmc.com
My professor that taught me Fire Dynamics I and II once explained to me that, when modeling a compartment fire, we are often aiming to be around 30% accurate.

That's right... 30%. He said the only other science that is comparable is meteorology, because of all the transient, nonlinear relationships, the only hard theoretical relationships come in the flavor of unsolvable (by analytical means) partial differentials, and the wide majority of hard predictions are based on extrapolation and correlations from historical emperical data that was collected over a number of years by questionable or at least unknown or different methods than widely accepted today.

As we all know, it is far from an exact or even accurate science.

That's why I tend to defend meteorologists while everyone else dumps on them constantly. The arm chair meteorologists tend to think they're more knowledgeable than the college degrees when they get lucky a few times.

I do hope that the meteorology community is not having the same difficulties as we are in fire science with computer models though. They are great tools to have but too often they're used as a be all and end all.
 
Top