• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Balsams Grand Resort teams up with ski industry legend Les Otten

wtcobb

New member
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
825
Points
0
Location
North of the Notch
Basically I'm calling BS on Otten claiming he's all for renewable energy and that's why he's backing Northern Pass. $2M seems like a more compelling reason to back a project.
 

jaytrem

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
2,112
Points
113
Yes, sorry, Biomass. And having more trees today than any time in the past 200 years doesn't change the consumption of wood vs. the growth. I burned 2+ cords this winter. Denser NE hardwoods - the ones we strive after for heat - are slow growth. Point here is that Biomass isn't renewable the same way solar/wind is. Yes, the trees grow back, but if you harvest faster than they grow, it's not really renewable...

I'd say it's pretty renewable. Most of the pellets are made from a byproduct of saw mills, sawdust. And apparently soft woods make for better pellets (see link below). Driving around Northern BC about I month ago I think I saw enough massive piles of sawdust to heat the whole world with pellets. So until demand is higher than supply I'd say it's renewable.

http://www.pelletking.com/wood-pellet-information.aspx
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
Wood is a carbon neutral fuel, which is important to some people. Harvesting the wood and transporting it is far from carbon neutral, however.

Burning wood is like eating organic food. It's fine if some people do it, but if everyone did it the environmental consequences would be devastating.


.
 

AdironRider

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
3,573
Points
83
Yes, sorry, Biomass. And having more trees today than any time in the past 200 years doesn't change the consumption of wood vs. the growth. I burned 2+ cords this winter. Denser NE hardwoods - the ones we strive after for heat - are slow growth. Point here is that Biomass isn't renewable the same way solar/wind is. Yes, the trees grow back, but if you harvest faster than they grow, it's not really renewable...

A properly managed woodlot can produce 1-1.25 cords per acre a year, every year, for eternity. If you were really savvy it would be a sugarbush as well.
 

Harvey

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
1,295
Points
83
Location
North River, NY
Website
nyskiblog.com
A properly managed woodlot can produce 1-1.25 cords per acre a year, every year, for eternity. If you were really savvy it would be a sugarbush as well.

How big a lot do you need to produce that much?

I'm using a bit less than a cord, and have a pretty large lot. Unfortunately buying the word "makes more sense" (not for the environment, but by my own selfish calculus) when I figure the value of my free time. It ends up split and stacked right where I need it.
 

SIKSKIER

New member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
3,667
Points
0
Location
Bedford and Franconia NH
I like to just turn the dial on the thermostat.I burn wood for the ambiance in my fierplace at the skihouse.It sucks the heat right out of the place but its nice to look at.
 

AdironRider

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
3,573
Points
83
My in laws have been getting it done for 50 years or so off their 10 acre lot.

No argument on the just pay and get it stacked, I do the same. I was referencing the notion that wood isn't sustainable, when in fact it is when managed properly.
 

wtcobb

New member
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
825
Points
0
Location
North of the Notch
That's really cool your folks manage the land. Wish my property was more heavily wooded to achieve that. I'm still behind VTK's comment:

Burning wood is like eating organic food. It's fine if some people do it, but if everyone did it the environmental consequences would be devastating.

Here's a neat graphic showing total and annual energy reserves from different sources:

Global_energy_potential_perez_2009_en.svg_.png



Anyways, point of the post was Otten's funding from F-NH / Northern Pass.
 

Newpylong

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2005
Messages
5,190
Points
113
Location
Upper Valley, NH
My in laws have been getting it done for 50 years or so off their 10 acre lot.

No argument on the just pay and get it stacked, I do the same. I was referencing the notion that wood isn't sustainable, when in fact it is when managed properly.

I have 22 acres and still pay for some of the wood I use! Lotta labor in the whole process from downing to splitting.
 

bdfreetuna

New member
Joined
Jan 12, 2012
Messages
4,300
Points
0
Location
keep the faith
A properly managed woodlot can produce 1-1.25 cords per acre a year, every year, for eternity. If you were really savvy it would be a sugarbush as well.

Managed to get 10-15 cords a year out of 11 acres for about 10 years straight without thinning out the woods.

So that sounds accurate based on my experience.

Very time and labor consuming though. Lots of weekends spent cutting and hauling dead or diseased trees.
 

AdironRider

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
3,573
Points
83
Never said it was easy.

I don't think anyone is saying wood would replace everything (as that chart implies total energy use, not just heat like 99.9% of wood is used for), but there is plenty of resource there to go around in colder climates.

Besides, its a pretty local thing. The logistics of moving cord wood around (even without cutting, splitting, etc to begin with) is ridiculous.
 

bootladder

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
54
Points
0
Location
Natick MA and Sugar Hill NH
Les Otten is in the pocket of Quebec Hydro/Northern Pass, and as a home owner in NH I am not in favor.

$2M from "Forward NH" to Les to promote an unnecessary power line built at the expense of many acres of woodlands in Ontario (hydo power-via flooding), environmental problems in NH. Les not a good neighbor. Go back to Maine. LePage probably loves you.


http://nhpr.org/post/northern-pass-investing-balsams

This activity may have already been posted on this board, but the search feature of the board doesn't turn anything up.
 

ss20

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
3,983
Points
113
Location
A minute from the Alta exit off the I-15!
Les Otten is in the pocket of Quebec Hydro/Northern Pass, and as a home owner in NH I am not in favor.

$2M from "Forward NH" to Les to promote an unnecessary power line built at the expense of many acres of woodlands in Ontario (hydo power-via flooding), environmental problems in NH. Les not a good neighbor. Go back to Maine. LePage probably loves you.


http://nhpr.org/post/northern-pass-investing-balsams

This activity may have already been posted on this board, but the search feature of the board doesn't turn anything up.

I don't think people who ski down mountains where thousands and thousand and thousands of trees have been cleared for their sport really care about the trees that are cut for a power line. I know I'm in that boat at least. And if more power up north means lower electricity costs for the resorts and therefore more snowmaking I am ALL for it.

Just my .02 cents.
 

cdskier

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
6,603
Points
113
Location
NJ
I don't think people who ski down mountains where thousands and thousand and thousands of trees have been cleared for their sport really care about the trees that are cut for a power line. I know I'm in that boat at least. And if more power up north means lower electricity costs for the resorts and therefore more snowmaking I am ALL for it.

Just my .02 cents.

I would completely disagree. I think there are many skiers that also care deeply about the environment and trees... I bet there are a lot of skiers that wish LESS trees had been cut on the mountains that they ski. Personally I like narrower trails anyway...

That said I know nothing about this Forward NH project and what it entails. The article linked had very little info so I can't make a decision one way or the other.
 

Smellytele

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
10,114
Points
113
Location
Right where I want to be
I don't think people who ski down mountains where thousands and thousand and thousands of trees have been cleared for their sport really care about the trees that are cut for a power line. I know I'm in that boat at least. And if more power up north means lower electricity costs for the resorts and therefore more snowmaking I am ALL for it.

Just my .02 cents.

The northern pass power is not scheduled to provide any power to northern NH or any of NH at all it is just transmission lines to feed Southern New England as far as I have read.
 

Newpylong

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2005
Messages
5,190
Points
113
Location
Upper Valley, NH
With the recent plan to bury all but a handfull of miles of transmission line and mandatory wholesale % of electric going to NH Utilities I am all for the Northern Pass. There is not enough natural gas into the region, coal has been priced out, and even the NIMBYs are fighting solar now. There simply is too much demand and not enough supply and electric rates are outrageous especially in winter. It doesn't surprise me that the Balsams or any company is supportive.
 

mbedle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,768
Points
48
Location
Barto, Pennsylvania
With the recent plan to bury all but a handfull of miles of transmission line and mandatory wholesale % of electric going to NH Utilities I am all for the Northern Pass. There is not enough natural gas into the region, coal has been priced out, and even the NIMBYs are fighting solar now. There simply is too much demand and not enough supply and electric rates are outrageous especially in winter. It doesn't surprise me that the Balsams or any company is supportive.

See the above link - only 60 miles will be buried, but it will use 160 miles of existing transmission lines or bury the lines, leaving only 32 miles of new cut area.
 
Top