• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

fleece pants or long johns

What do you wear for leggings under your pants shell

  • fleece

    Votes: 4 26.7%
  • thermal long johns

    Votes: 8 53.3%
  • au natural

    Votes: 3 20.0%

  • Total voters
    15

ski220

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
351
Points
0
I wear a Marmont Gore-Tex Pants shell with fleece pants underneath. A lot of people I know seem to wear thermal long johns under their shells but I find that thermals are too hot and the fleece breaths much better. Added benifits are - 1) I can wear differant wieghts of fleece depending on the day and 2) apre ski I can remove my shell and not look like a dork in long johns.
 

skidbump

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2005
Messages
743
Points
18
Location
hyde park,ny
Thin sweats to about 20 then i have some thicker sweats to low single digits and some heavy fleece for sub zero.
 

wa-loaf

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
15,109
Points
48
Location
Mordor
Patagonia medium weight capeline long johns. I do want to get a pair of wool (icebreaker) 3/4 length long johns. Fleece pants = too bulky.
 

cbcbd

New member
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
1,720
Points
0
Location
Seattle,WA
Long johns on a regular day.
If it's really cold then I wear long johns and my stretchy fleece pants over them - they are not bulky fleece and are form fitting so actually feel pretty good.
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,724
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
Patagonia medium weight capeline long johns. I do want to get a pair of wool (icebreaker) 3/4 length long johns. Fleece pants = too bulky.

The ice breakers are what I'm looking to get as well. Email with link to the product was sent to the lady one month prior to my birthday, so hopefully she bites :lol:
 

severine

New member
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Messages
12,367
Points
0
Location
CT
Website
poetinthepantry.com
Midweight Techwick-type base layer in warmer weather; fleece tights (not pants - they hug the body) when it's really cold. Near the end of my last season, I had switched to non-insulated board pants for skiing and this combo worked well with the above base layers.
 

ski220

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
351
Points
0
Midweight Techwick-type base layer in warmer weather; fleece tights (not pants - they hug the body) when it's really cold. Near the end of my last season, I had switched to non-insulated board pants for skiing and this combo worked well with the above base layers.


This is exactly what I don't understand. For me, I find that the tighter fitting long john style are HOTTER than a loose fitting fleece which will allow more air circulation around the leg. For the amount of hiking and skinning that I do I need the ventilation.
 

Hawkshot99

Active member
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
4,489
Points
36
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY
This is exactly what I don't understand. For me, I find that the tighter fitting long john style are HOTTER than a loose fitting fleece which will allow more air circulation around the leg. For the amount of hiking and skinning that I do I need the ventilation.

I used to wear a looser sweat pant. Now I wear real thin tight pants that are like the underarmour, but different brand. My ski pants are a uninsulated shell, and I usually have the vents open down below 20's. I find that both my current tight pants and my old sweats are about the same warmth wise, but the sweats are a whole lot more bulky.
 

severine

New member
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Messages
12,367
Points
0
Location
CT
Website
poetinthepantry.com
This is exactly what I don't understand. For me, I find that the tighter fitting long john style are HOTTER than a loose fitting fleece which will allow more air circulation around the leg. For the amount of hiking and skinning that I do I need the ventilation.
I only use the fleece tights for cold (under 20 degrees) night skiing (when I want the warmth). And again, these are non-insulated shells. Otherwise, I go with the midweight capilene-Bergelene-etc-type base layer pants. I learned last season that less is more. I skied the end of the season with very little on in the manner of layers... midweight bottoms, midweight top, and either a non-insulated hardshell jacket or a lighter softshell, non-insulated hardshell pants. And that was for night skiing. I was quite comfortable.
 

bvibert

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
30,394
Points
38
Location
Torrington, CT
For me it depends on the temperature. I'm pretty sure that more often than not I just wore my uninsulated shells with lightweight nylon hiking pants underneath. I don't think the hiking pants actually do anything, it's just what I wear to the mountain. It's easier to just throw my shell on over them then to strip down to my skivees in the lodge or parking lot. If it's really cold I'll wear a pair of light weight synthetic long johns underneath the pants.
 

Greg

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 1, 2001
Messages
31,154
Points
0
I've got midweight fleece pants that I normally wear unless it's above 30 degrees or so.
 

Beetlenut

New member
Joined
Dec 28, 2004
Messages
1,945
Points
0
Location
Wakefield, RI
Usually wear long johns. I have several different weights of duofold that I wear, sometimes layered if really cold weather. Since they are all wicking, I never get too hot. They're thin, so they provide for a lot of movement under my shell pants. Fleece would be too bulky for me.
 
Top