• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Huntah sold to Peak Resorts

john1200c

New member
Joined
Dec 4, 2009
Messages
124
Points
0
Location
MA
Hunter! At least that's what Google said. Is it not Hunter?

Oh no idea. I thought you may have been posting a picture of another Peak Resorts ski area to show their snowmaking capabilities... It probably is Hunter. I just looked at their trail map it looks similar...
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
I posted it to show that whatever system is in place is pretty darned impressive. It may need some preventative maintenance but it clearly packs a punch.
 

Scruffy

Active member
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
1,157
Points
38
Location
In the shadow of the moon.
When was this? I'm impressed.

That's the first photo of the place I have ever seen. That is a weird layout. How do you get any sustained vertical out of that place? It looks like a bunch of little learning hills stacked on top of each other.

The back side (west side), not pictured.
 

Funky_Catskills

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2014
Messages
1,342
Points
48
Location
Hunter, NY
When was this? I'm impressed.

That's the first photo of the place I have ever seen. That is a weird layout. How do you get any sustained vertical out of that place? It looks like a bunch of little learning hills stacked on top of each other.

Expert side (West Side) is straight falline
 

Scruffy

Active member
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
1,157
Points
38
Location
In the shadow of the moon.
It's hard to argue with this level of snowmaking:

attachment.php

At one time they where trying to expand into that bowl on the left in that picture. They were trying to do a land swap with the state for some of their land on the west side, but the state would not play ball.
Your looking at 1600' vert as it is now. If they could expand into that bowl, Hunter would rival any other resort in the east.
 
Last edited:

ScottySkis

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 16, 2011
Messages
12,294
Points
48
Location
Middletown NY
I know several people who have them. Seems to be an issue with every sale like this.

At one time they where trying to expand into that bowl on the left in that picture. They were trying to do a land swap with the state for some of their land on the west side, but the state would not play ball.
Your looking at 1600' vert as it is now. If they could expand into that bowl, Hunter would rival any other resort in the east.

He's it be awesome. Learn from hiking that Catskills mountain s are much more bigger then their trails at various hills.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,576
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
At one time they where trying to expand into that bowl on the left in that picture. They were trying to do a land swap with the state for some of their land on the west side, but the state would not play ball.
Your looking at 1600' vert as it is now. If they could expand into that bowl, Hunter would rival any other resort in the east.

It would be really cool, but lets not get all cray-cray. The vert would be much better, but they'd realistically likely be pretty limited with what they could do even if they had access. It is too bad that the Eco-extremists have the politicians by the purse-strings through.
 

Jully

Active member
Joined
Dec 13, 2014
Messages
2,487
Points
38
Location
Boston, MA
It would be really cool, but lets not get all cray-cray. The vert would be much better, but they'd realistically likely be pretty limited with what they could do even if they had access. It is too bad that the Eco-extremists have the politicians by the purse-strings through.

+1
 

Funky_Catskills

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2014
Messages
1,342
Points
48
Location
Hunter, NY
It would be really cool, but lets not get all cray-cray. The vert would be much better, but they'd realistically likely be pretty limited with what they could do even if they had access. It is too bad that the Eco-extremists have the politicians by the purse-strings through.

Hunter owns into the what we call the "ravine"...
There has been some log clearing from lately.. Some of the dying tree from some insect..

the also own the property next to Anna Purna..

it could be done..
 

mriceyman

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
1,344
Points
0
Location
cnj
At one time they where trying to expand into that bowl on the left in that picture. They were trying to do a land swap with the state for some of their land on the west side, but the state would not play ball.
Your looking at 1600' vert as it is now. If they could expand into that bowl, Hunter would rival any other resort in the east.

If that were to happen they would be in a totally different ballpark skiing wise. Would make the place awesome imo


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,331
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
Hunter owns into the what we call the "ravine"...
There has been some log clearing from lately.. Some of the dying tree from some insect..

the also own the property next to Anna Purna..

it could be done..

Do they own anything above where the current lifts summit? I've never been to Hunter, but my understanding is there is a fair bit of unused vertical yes?

How much of the physical mountain lies within the "Forever Wild" region of the Catskills?
 
Last edited:

Mapnut

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
644
Points
0
Location
Connecticut
yeggous; That is a weird layout. How do you get any sustained vertical out of that place? It looks like a bunch of little learning hills stacked on top of each other.[/QUOTE said:
Actually the 1500-foot vertical of the two or three runs on either side of the high-speed 6-pack (you can probably figure out on the photo where that goes) is pretty good sustained vertical too. Not exactly fall-line, but no flats. It's actually steeper toward the bottom. 1300' fall-line vertical on the west side.
(The 1600' vertical has to be measured to the bottom of the bunny slopes in the foreground.)
 

Funky_Catskills

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2014
Messages
1,342
Points
48
Location
Hunter, NY
Do they own anything above where the current lifts summit? I've never been to Hunter, but my understanding is there is a fair bit of unused vertical yes?

How much of the physical mountain lies within the "Forever Wildcat" region of the Catskills?

They do..
We live in the Catskill Forest Preserve. But i think Forever wild is only for land owned by the state..
 

EPB

Active member
Joined
Nov 13, 2005
Messages
990
Points
28
It would be really cool, but lets not get all cray-cray. The vert would be much better, but they'd realistically likely be pretty limited with what they could do even if they had access. It is too bad that the Eco-extremists have the politicians by the purse-strings through.

BG - the solution is simple. NY users a miles-based system, right? They just need to clear cut some sections of the existing footprint to buy more mileage...
 
Top