jaywbigred
Active member
Personally, I think the non-call on Stoll was because it didn't look as bad as the Bernier hit. There was no glass for Gionta to ram his face into, so he sort of folded over the boards. Not sure if that's better or worse, but I believe that was a factor in the non-call.
When you look at the Bernier hit on a replay, particularly from the overhead camera, it looks like more of an unfortunate hit than a malicious one. He didn't have as much room as I thought he did, and I can totally see how Bernier thought Scuderi would keep the puck on the forehand and continue behind the net, not backhand it and slam on the brakes, like he did. However, we have the luxury of replay. In real-time, at ice level and depending on the ref's view (the one who called it was along the left boards), I can absolutely see how they called that. Maybe a more appropriate call would have been a double-minor, but that's the type of hit the NHL is trying to eliminate from the game. It's a shame it happened in the deciding game of the Cup finals.
I think that is a fair assessment, except for the part about the type of hit they have been trying to target for extra penalties. There was no targeting of the head in that penalty. They other thing that totally went missing was the punch to the head as the Devils touched up, which was absolutely nasty. Start watching #25 for the Kings, the puck carrier, at around the 17 second mark. That was a targeted head shot. Just a really bad sequence for the refs, the Devils, and frankly, for hockey. But the Devils did not show the resilience of a champion. Too bad.