UVSHTSTRM
New member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2009
- Messages
- 879
- Points
- 0
Sounds like Saddleback got the Jackpot from this storm and since Thursday...34-42 inches. Not sure if these are "Ski Resort Inches" or not.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
They both got just under two feet for the big storm. From the reports, Saddleback was good but not great until Sunday. Before that they only had 2-3 runs off the quad. If you consider the storm from Thursday through Monday, Saddleback sure got the goods. But both resorts had a similar epic Sunday with similar totals. End results are nice but from a practical stand point, Saddleback was not a jackpot nor epic until Sunday due to the nearly two feet.Well if you consider 31 inches at Cannon and 48 at Saddleback a tie..........:-D
Either way they both got nailed.
They both got just under two feet for the big storm. From the reports, Saddleback was good but not great until Sunday. Before that they only had 2-3 runs off the quad. If you consider the storm from Thursday through Monday, Saddleback sure got the goods. But both resorts had a similar epic Sunday with similar totals. End results are nice but from a practical stand point, Saddleback was not a jackpot nor epic until Sunday due to the nearly two feet.
Saddleback was not a jackpot nor epic until Sunday due to the nearly two feet.
I think Saddleback and Cannon may have tied for the Jackpot. Such a weird freaking storm!
Saddleback got the jackpot for the storm (Thursday-Sunday). Fine to point out that both areas received similar amounts from the heavy bands Saturday night into Sunday, but to say they tied for the jackpot from this storm is just plain false. For the record, I don't ski either area, but it is hard to argue the numbers!
Thank you, I guess that was my only point, but didn't do a good enough job to convey this to rivercoil. I would also like to add that I think many on Sunday and Monday thought Saddleback was epic, especially considering SB's low skier visits probably left many untouched areas through Monday when everthing wrapped up that probably had thigh deep powder.
Hard to argue the facts. From what I have heard about Saddleback and their low skier visits, there is probably still some untracked lines. Looking forward to skiing there for the first time ever in a couple weeks!
Born and raised in Maine, probably two hours north and east of there, and never had the chance of skiing it. Alwasy went to Big Squaw and Sugarloaf when I had the money. I keep saying I am going to make it back to go there, but never do, always end up going to the Loaf for some reason.
Born and raised in Maine, probably two hours north and east of there, and never had the chance of skiing it. Alwasy went to Big Squaw and Sugarloaf when I had the money. I keep saying I am going to make it back to go there, but never do, always end up going to the Loaf for some reason.
It seems strange to me that a lot of people from Maine have never been to Saddleback, especially over the last 3-4 years with all the improvements and the fact that it is so much cheaper. Of course distance is always going to be a factor depending on where you live but it's still a little surprising. The terrain is arguabley as good or better than SR and SL (although less expansive) and by mid season conditions are probably better given less traffic and higher snow totals.
Lately, I've found myself skiing Saddleback more than the other 2 because I can't get to the top almost every day and am able to consistently ski the mountains best terrain (here's where SL becomes a problem).
Of course the main lift is old and slow, and if you're looking for a lot of off hill activities you aint gonna find them...
It seems strange to me that a lot of people from Maine have never been to Saddleback, especially over the last 3-4 years with all the improvements and the fact that it is so much cheaper. Of course distance is always going to be a factor depending on where you live but it's still a little surprising. The terrain is arguabley as good or better than SR and SL (although less expansive) and by mid season conditions are probably better given less traffic and higher snow totals.
Lately, I've found myself skiing Saddleback more than the other 2 because I can't get to the top almost every day and am able to consistently ski the mountains best terrain (here's where SL becomes a problem).
Of course the main lift is old and slow, and if you're looking for a lot of off hill activities you aint gonna find them...
I don't live in Maine anymore....my folks still live there so when I go home I usually go to Sugarloaf as that is where many of my friends families have places and I can easily pass by it if I want to take that route home. When I started riding in the 90's Squaw was closer and believe it or not cheaper.....15 bucks for lift tickets or 250 for a seasons pass.