Smellytele
Well-known member
Dream on.
I agree it is more fun to ski than Sugarloaf - not a dream.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Dream on.
SB and SL are basically a tie for me, obviously very different hills though. It would be hard for me to imagine driving all the way up there and not skiing both back to back.
Both have great terrain but each has an edge on the other depending on your skiing preference. If you prefer skiing big top-to-bottom groomers then you probably prefer Sugarloaf. If you prefer more natural gnarly runs with trees and bumps, you probably prefer Saddleback.
I don't disagree entirely...but I'm pretty comfortable and respectfully stating that SB has loads of long groomed blues!Both have great terrain but each has an edge on the other depending on your skiing preference. If you prefer skiing big top-to-bottom groomers then you probably prefer Sugarloaf. If you prefer more natural gnarly runs with trees and bumps, you probably prefer Saddleback.
A top to bottom lift would cause too much traffic on America probably. I like the way the lifts are laid out now, minus the sometimes waits on the slow double.
Not much. Keep an eye on this link, Sugarloaf Today site. Chris Farmer tends to respond/post a bit here too.
http://www.sugarloaftoday.com/chat/...id=09a1b723da9b9c5a691a2cd9b67fea79&start=600
A top to bottom lift would cause too much traffic on America probably. I like the way the lifts are laid out now, minus the sometimes waits on the slow double.