There is one death rate which has been remarkable, the death rate relative to the overall population. In NY and NJ, slightly more than 1 of 1000 people have died, which is shocking to me. And some people (including here) have said that NY is a special case because of the extreme density of NYC, but the same thing has happened all over the NE. Here's the death rate comparison:
1. NY 1.4 deaths per 1000 persons
2. NJ 1.0
3. Conn 0.8
4. Mass 0.7
If the whole country achieved 1 in 1000 deaths, and it may happen, we would end up with 330k deaths.
As far as policy goes, a lot depends on whether an effective vaccine or treatment shows up by January 2021 or so. If you believe this to be the case, it would probably make sense to lock things down and save a bunch of lives, like they have done in Washington state. OTOH, if we assume that it will take until late 2021 to get a vaccine, you might as well just lift the lockdown because people will probably end up getting infected anyway.
Personally, I am for lifting the lockdown, but in a very controlled way. Loosen up a little, wait three weeks, then reevaluate.
1. NY 1.4 deaths per 1000 persons
2. NJ 1.0
3. Conn 0.8
4. Mass 0.7
If the whole country achieved 1 in 1000 deaths, and it may happen, we would end up with 330k deaths.
As far as policy goes, a lot depends on whether an effective vaccine or treatment shows up by January 2021 or so. If you believe this to be the case, it would probably make sense to lock things down and save a bunch of lives, like they have done in Washington state. OTOH, if we assume that it will take until late 2021 to get a vaccine, you might as well just lift the lockdown because people will probably end up getting infected anyway.
Personally, I am for lifting the lockdown, but in a very controlled way. Loosen up a little, wait three weeks, then reevaluate.