• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

So Who is Behind Powder Mountain?

Former Sunday Rivah Rat

Active member
Joined
Mar 26, 2020
Messages
264
Points
43
In line for the 1st chair at Snowbasin the guy next to me told me that Powder mountain had shut down for the day for windhold and avy work on the road. There was not much wind at Snowbasin so we thought it pretty lame that Powder would close the day after getting over a foot of snow on the 1st Sunday of pass holder only weekends in February. He called him Greid Hoffman :) His thinking was they can't sell $211 day tickets so why open for just the passholders?
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,936
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
In line for the 1st chair at Snowbasin the guy next to me told me that Powder mountain had shut down for the day for windhold and avy work on the road. There was not much wind at Snowbasin so we thought it pretty lame that Powder would close the day after getting over a foot of snow on the 1st Sunday of pass holder only weekends in February. He called him Greid Hoffman :) His thinking was they can't sell $211 day tickets so why open for just the passholders?
The road to PowMow is a bitch. But that seems weird to close completely.
 

urungus

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
2,414
Points
113
Location
Western Mass

Quoting from the article:
In that zone, development is basically limited to seasonal cabins ... because most of the homes are expected to be second homes, they would qualify as “seasonal cabins.”

I’m sure that was the intent of the original writers of the zoning law
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,936
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Quoting from the article:
In that zone, development is basically limited to seasonal cabins ... because most of the homes are expected to be second homes, they would qualify as “seasonal cabins.”

I’m sure that was the intent of the original writers of the zoning law
That line made me laugh.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
33,936
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Bump.

Another instance in which EB-5 investors and ski areas do not mix well. These investors were brought in by the previous regime to finance a hotel project. They now are suing Reid Hastings. I am a bit surprised as to the fact that Reid took on this liability. I would have told the Summit Bros that this was their problem and not included this in the purchase.



According to court filings, Summit Mountain Holding paid NBA star Kobe Bryant $250,000 to go to China to woo potential investors.

:rolleyes:

And if that article is behind a paywall.....

 

raisingarizona

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
1,167
Points
113
A lot of the coldest and/or most reliable conditions ski areas are slowly becoming privatized. I was working up at big Sky this past summer and you can see how it’s moving closer and closer to a full on private model. Even if it’s not completely private the public part of the ski area has become so expensive that most regular working class people have been priced out of skiing there.

This is unfortunately the future of the ski business industry if the climate science is correct. If quality product becomes scarce the demand and value increases leaving only enough for the minority that can afford it.
 

Smellytele

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
10,431
Points
113
Location
Right where I want to be
A lot of the coldest and/or most reliable conditions ski areas are slowly becoming privatized. I was working up at big Sky this past summer and you can see how it’s moving closer and closer to a full on private model. Even if it’s not completely private the public part of the ski area has become so expensive that most regular working class people have been priced out of skiing there.

This is unfortunately the future of the ski business industry if the climate science is correct. If quality product becomes scarce the demand and value increases leaving only enough for the minority that can afford it.
The part of that area that is private is Yellowstone. Big sky its self is still huge.
 

raisingarizona

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
1,167
Points
113
The part of that area that is private is Yellowstone. Big sky its self is still huge.
Could you buy a house there and pay the mortgage with the job you find there?


Ya, that’s what I figured. Jackson is the same way. The privatization of the greater Yellowstone area continues.
 
Last edited:

LonghornSkier

Active member
Joined
Jul 9, 2008
Messages
323
Points
28
Location
Hoboken
I got a job offer in Bozeman earlier this year paying $230k for a corporate finance role. Though that won't buy you a mansion in Bozeman, you can find something OK if you look around (especially with a spouse also bringing income to the table).

The industries that pay well anywhere know that they can't lowball candidates in these resort markets anymore due to housing prices. There's not a huge "lifestyle discount" anymore - that job may have paid $250-270k in NY. Didn't end up accepting it, but just a data point.
 

urungus

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
2,414
Points
113
Location
Western Mass
I got a job offer in Bozeman earlier this year paying $230k for a corporate finance role. Though that won't buy you a mansion in Bozeman, you can find something OK if you look around (especially with a spouse also bringing income to the table).

Good for you, but regular working class people such as lift attendants do not have a family income of $300k+, that is around 95th percentile
 
Last edited:

raisingarizona

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 19, 2014
Messages
1,167
Points
113
I got a job offer in Bozeman earlier this year paying $230k for a corporate finance role. Though that won't buy you a mansion in Bozeman, you can find something OK if you look around (especially with a spouse also bringing income to the table).

The industries that pay well anywhere know that they can't lowball candidates in these resort markets anymore due to housing prices. There's not a huge "lifestyle discount" anymore - that job may have paid $250-270k in NY. Didn't end up accepting it, but just a data point.
The median household income in Bozeman is around 85k for a more realistic data point. If you’re trying to raise a family there on that or even twice as much then spending time skiing at big sky probably isn’t going to be on top of your priority list.

You probably should have taken that job.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,965
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
This is unfortunately the future of the ski business industry if the climate science is correct.

No, it isn't.

You keep saying this, which makes it obvious you don't really know what the actual "climate science" you mention, actually says.

It's weird actually, almost like you fetish on the worst draconian outcome even though the science doesn't suggest this. FWIW, they've been generally "wrong" to the downside for decades now as most predictions have not been as bad as they said, but forgetting that point entirely, let's suggest "the climate science is correct" as you postulate, well, then it mean North American degrees Fahrenheit is about 4 degrees or so warmer 75 to 100 years from now, we will still have snow skiing literally every single place in North America where is currently exists.
 
Top