Geoff
Well-known member
Hold a sec... do I understand correctly that not everyone is scanned? Only folks that are either randomly selected (well, that seems pointless) or those that set off the detector? I think the random thing sucks and is dumb, that is not going to deter any one and only suggests the possibility of profiling. But if only those folks that set off the first alarm are going on to the next scan or pat down, I say NO PROBLEM. I am 100% OK with these scans if they are primarily being used as an additional precaution when an initial detector is set off.
You understand correctly. Most people just pass through the metal detector. In the Supreme Court rulings about road blocks, everybody had to be treated identically. Selecting people at random for additional searches is unconstitutional. I think that if this gets challenged, it will be "everybody or nobody".