• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Vail Resorts CEO on Why More People Aren't Skiing More

trackbiker

Active member
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
368
Points
28
Location
Eastern PA
We should also keep in mind that the hills in the mid-west are much smaller. This enters into the equation of how far people are willing to travel to get to them.

Good point. People in the northeast can drive to an area with 2000+ vertical. In the midwest they have to fly to get to one. If they have a choice to go east or west they are going west. I always run into a lot of people from the midwest when I ski out west.
 

skiNEwhere

Active member
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
4,141
Points
38
Location
Dubai
We should also keep in mind that the hills in the mid-west are much smaller. This enters into the equation of how far people are willing to travel to get to them.

But....the average skier likes groomed cruisers.

What's the difference between 100 inches of groomed snow vs. 300 inches of groomed snow to the typical skier?

Loon does have a lot of out of staters. It's hard to say if they are day tripping or getting a motel/hotel though.

My mother was a typical day skier, and loon was the very edge of the day trip range, so maybe WVV could be a possibility. But she also knew how to ski. It's hard to say if VR wants a resort where beginners would feel comfortable to day trip. I think they want a hill where they can get people easily into the sport.

They are kind of like drug dealers, get them hooked for real cheap, then get them to spend a lot of money on the product by having them pay a lot at their destination resorts.
 

Domeskier

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
2,278
Points
63
Location
New York
Good point. People in the northeast can drive to an area with 2000+ vertical. In the midwest they have to fly to get to one. If they have a choice to go east or west they are going west. I always run into a lot of people from the midwest when I ski out west.

Some people in the Midwest are within driving distance from triple black diamond extreme skiing!!!

Bohemia.jpg
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
I think they want a hill where they can get people easily into the sport.
The day tripper thing is somewhat of a red herring. Regarding exposure to urbanites, I think Vail's primary concern is how many people they can get from the urban area - regardless of whether they are day tripping or spending the night. The overall number is the key. My point was that people are more likely to travel farther from an urban center if there is incentive to do so. I doubt that as many people are willing to drive three hours for 100 extra vertical feet than would be willing to drive for a few hundred extra vertical. Thus, their business model may not be the same when you compare the midwest to the northeast. Only they know, but it's at least food for thought.

As for getting beginners on the slopes, what is Vail's primary goal? Is it to develop customers that will eventually buy real estate and travel to the Rockies, or is it to market to customers that are already inclined to do so? I assume there is an element of both, but I don't take it for granted that I know which segment of the market is their primary focus.
 

trackbiker

Active member
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
368
Points
28
Location
Eastern PA
Some people in the Midwest are within driving distance from triple black diamond extreme skiing!!!

One thing is that Mt. Bohemia is 10 hrs. from Detroit, 8 hrs. from Chicago, and 7+ hrs. from Minneapolis.
The second is that the "average" skier wants well groomed blue cruisers.
I'd love to hit that place sometime though.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
Some people in the Midwest are within driving distance from triple black diamond extreme skiing!!!
At least they were nice enough to relocate their "Extreme Back Country" to the very front and center of the resort.
 

skiNEwhere

Active member
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
4,141
Points
38
Location
Dubai
I'd imagine real estate is their ultimate goal. I can't really speculate any further on that without having to start listening to their quarterly conference call though.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
I'd imagine real estate is their ultimate goal.
Agreed. By "segment of the market" I was referring to experienced skiers versus beginning skiers. I was not referring to real estate purchasers versus people likely to travel to the Rockies.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,583
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Good point. People in the northeast can drive to an area with 2000+ vertical. In the midwest they have to fly to get to one. If they have a choice to go east or west they are going west. I always run into a lot of people from the midwest when I ski out west.

But....the average skier likes groomed cruisers.

What's the difference between 100 inches of groomed snow vs. 300 inches of groomed snow to the typical skier?

I'd never thought about this, but given the above is true, and given the average mid-western skier is likely less skilled than the average eastern or western skier, it's probably unnecessary for many since the eastern terrain is likely difficult enough for them.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,583
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Some people in the Midwest are within driving distance from triple black diamond extreme skiing!!!

attachment.php

820 feet of vertical, and virtually the entire place is Black Diamond.

What the holy hell?
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,349
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
Waterville. It has strong history, convenience to the Boston market, and a recent turbulent run of ownership.

I was going to say that outside of Killington, Waterville makes the most sense to me. If Powdr would ever sell, Killington would be very expensive to buy. Waterville would be much much cheaper. One other thing about Waterville is they have the permits in place for substantial expansion of ski terrain and I would assume real estate development to go along with it. I think that that would be important for Vail in buying a NE ski resort. They would want the ability to make cash on real estate, which these days is much more profitable than resort operations.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,583
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
I was going to say that outside of Killington, Waterville makes the most sense to me. If Powdr would ever sell, Killington would be very expensive to buy. Waterville would be much much cheaper. One other thing about Waterville is they have the permits in place for substantial expansion of ski terrain and I would assume real estate development to go along with it. I think that that would be important for Vail in buying a NE ski resort. They would want the ability to make cash on real estate, which these days is much more profitable than resort operations.

I don't see Vail investing in Vermont. I don't think they'd buy someplace where it takes 8 years to cut down a tree.
 

St. Bear

New member
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
2,946
Points
0
Location
Washington, NJ
Website
twitter.com
I was going to say that outside of Killington, Waterville makes the most sense to me. If Powdr would ever sell, Killington would be very expensive to buy. Waterville would be much much cheaper. One other thing about Waterville is they have the permits in place for substantial expansion of ski terrain and I would assume real estate development to go along with it. I think that that would be important for Vail in buying a NE ski resort. They would want the ability to make cash on real estate, which these days is much more profitable than resort operations.

Nick, get on the bat phone and make this deal happen.
 

mbedle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,769
Points
48
Location
Barto, Pennsylvania
Extremely low overhead would be my guess. I don't think they make snow. Given the temperature up there, I would guess what does fall sticks around for a long time. And I check their historical snow fall and its not as high as I thought.
 
Top