DoublePlanker
Member
Upper, middle and lower is stupid unless difficulty changes from expert, intermediate, novice. My favorite trail map is Les Grands Montets where there are only 15 named pistes. Who needs names?
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
29 trails between three ski areas? Couldn't even imagine that today.
I like this old K map. It's actually overlayed onto a topographical which makes more sense to me than most trails maps which are very representational of the landscape.
View attachment 9751
We've had this discussion before. To me it makes a lot of sense to name trails upper, middle & lower at a lot of ski areas. For example upper Superstar at Killington opened over 3 weeks ago, middle Superstar opened last week, lower Superstar opened today. Would it have been right for K to say that Superstar was open 3 weeks ago when only the upper section was open at that time? Same thing applies on trails at a lot of other ski areas.
Wow! Wish I was around to have experienced this.
Killington?
Sent from my SCH-S735C using Tapatalk
Yes, circa 1960
Don't know if it was thinned out yet in that pic but Downdraft was originally a gladed trail.Nice. I wonder what there woods policy was back then ;-)
Sent from my SCH-S735C using Tapatalk
Don't know if it was thinned out yet in that pic but Downdraft was originally a gladed trail.