Puck it
Well-known member

Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
They say Kubric the great movie director was involved.moon landing. The significance of the picture however is the fact that the lunar module is in the picture. The skeptics on if we went to the moon, would question how was the picture taken?
Sent from my SGH-S959G using Tapatalk 2
Close. Not all
Correct. Who is the one?Right, short by 1
Doesn't include the person in the command module...Close. Not all
Umm, the one who took the picture! Taken from the command module, I assume, if you believe we really went there.:wink: My Dad work at Singer Link, they built the flight simulators for the Apollo program, when Neil Armstrong was asked what it was like going to the Moon, he said, "It was just like the simulation". If you saw the movie Apollo 13, there were scenes where they were using the simulator to work out the procedures to try to get the astronauts back to Earth, the simulator was invaluable. It must have been an interesting career for my Dad. When he started working there Link was building the "Blue Box" simulators which used bellows to make the thing pitch and yaw, Link was an organ builder. The last two projects my Dad worked on were the simulators for the F117, and B2 bomber, quite a change over 45 years!Correct. Who is the one?
Correct. Who is the one?
Fred Haise. He went back on 13, but obviously didn't get to land then, either. So, in a way, he'll always be excluded from the mass of humanity.
Not necessarily a bad distinction, really...
Nope. Haise was only on 13. He was back up for 8 and 11.
Nope. Just never thought of it like that.So, is there any signifigance other than the 99.99999% of humanity angle?