-
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Pole size question
- Thread starter zakyr
- Start date
andyzee
New member
Adjustable.
Really. I like those best, let's me choose, doesn't lock me in. I typically will get the Black Diamond Trekking poles. Great locks on them, no slippage.
Really. I like those best, let's me choose, doesn't lock me in. I typically will get the Black Diamond Trekking poles. Great locks on them, no slippage.
Puck it
Well-known member
I will say it
Size doesn't matter!
Size doesn't matter!
That's the tried and true method. If you're doing park stuff you may want to go a little shorter. I notice a lot of park rats have insanely short poles, I assume so that they're easier to maneuver around?
Yeah from what I have heard from people, a lot of the really good park skiers just have poles for balance/comfort. Many don't really ever have them come in contact with the ground.
Not sure if anyone watched the X Games, but one skier on slope-style dropped 1 of his poles and because of it he didn't even finish his run. The riders aren't required to even have poles, but because he was so use to having them, didn't even finish his run.
gmcunni
Active member
measured as above and then i knocked 2 inches off my poles after several seasons. I use them "all mountain" with no problems.
I prefer mine a bit shorter than that method as well, mostly for skiing in the bumps, but they work fine on the rest of the mountain. I got rid of the too short clown poles a few seasons back.
gmcunni
Active member
first few days after cutting them down was interesting but now i don't notice a difference.
Hawkshot99
Active member
According to the 90 degree rule I should use a 50" pole, but I am much more comfortable with a 48" so i use those. For racing I use a 52" to give a longer push out of the gate.
Cheese
New member
Unless you're racing, I would take 2" more off this length. The reason for the grab below the basket is assuming that the pole will actually penetrate the snow up to the basket. New England hard pack skiers rarely bury the tip to the basket while skiing so 2" shorter is more relevant.
You don't know Woodcore very well ...
I use the same length for racing. The only time you plant your pole racing anyway is at the start gate and maybe for a little skating to get to speed. I wouldn't want to go shorter than what I use.
Cheese
New member
Exactly. The tip blocks for your poles at the race start gate are below the level of your skis so it makes sense to go slightly longer for racing.
I thought you were advocating racing poles being 2" shorter?
Cheese
New member
No, the opposite. Take 2" off of free skiing poles when used in New England on hard pack. It's pretty likely I described this poorly.
Hawkshot99
Active member
Yes you did. You made it sound like take off 2" extra for a race pole vs. free ski. I always add a bbit.
o3jeff
New member
I go with shorter poles, found if they are too long that I end up in the back seat more than normal.
Hawkshot99
Active member
I normally ski with 48" poles but today I went out with my race poles. They are 50" and definitely found it alot harder to pole plant on my turns. The extra 2" made it harder to bring the tips forward without hitting the ground.
Similar threads
