- Joined
- Jul 1, 2001
- Messages
- 31,154
- Points
- 0
Gotta have the antithesis to this thread...
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
You must be a great bump skier. I wouldn't say Outer Limits is not challenging. Granted, I haven't been on it in several years, but I've been on OL with some huge bumps and it was certainly a challenge. Overall, it is overrated though. Anything wide enough that lets you traverse if you need to reduces the difficulty factor a lot.SkiDog said:I agree with Superstar as well as Outer Limits...they are hardly even challenging IMHO......
skibum1321 said:How could I forget about Liftline and National from the Front Four of Stowe. They're wide and kind of steep but nothing special.
Good point. Just because a run is overrated, doesn't mean it can't be a great run. I guess clarifying overrated is important too. Overrated in terms of trail difficulty designation (blue, black, double black, etc.) or simply reputation. If trail designation, Jericho (a double black at Jiminy) is overrated. Sure it's steep for the bottom third, but it's always groomed which I think makes it only as difficult as Whitetail (a single black). Just marketing, I guess.thetrailboss said:Nice run, but overrated.
Greg said:Good point. Just because a run is overrated, doesn't mean it can't be a great run. I guess clarifying overrated is important too. Overrated in terms of trail difficulty designation (blue, black, double black, etc.) or simply reputation. If trail designation, Jericho (a double black at Jiminy) is overrated. Sure it's steep for the bottom third, but it's always groomed which I think makes it only as difficult as Whitetail (a single black). Just marketing, I guess.
Agreed. In Jericho's case, it's actually often times a blessing in disguise. Usually it's the next run to open up after Whitetail and while they are of relatively similar pitch, Jericho usually skis better. This may be partially because of its double-black designation, which may scare off some "experts" which have no problem skiing the single-black Whitetail.kcyanks1 said:I agree the trail rating vs. reputation distinction is important, but often I think they are almost the same thing. A lof the trails we've been mentioning are double diamonds that are also marketed as being some of the most challenging terrain in the east.
I think it goes back to the saying that "trail ratings are relative"...would you agree that Goosebumps is harder than the blacks at Sunapee, even if the blacks aren't steep (at least by your standards ;-))?thetrailboss said:My nomination for overrated run is Goosebumps at Sunapee. Rated double black and has pitches that are the same as Burke's blue square Willoughby! Nice run, but overrated.
hammer said:I think it goes back to the saying that "trail ratings are relative"...would you agree that Goosebumps is harder than the blacks at Sunapee, even if the blacks aren't steep (at least by your standards ;-))?
Tin Woodsman said:Any expert run south of Sugarbush in VT, excluding all of Magic and Vertigo at K-Mart.
Tin Woodsman said:Any expert run south of Sugarbush in VT, excluding all of Magic and Vertigo at K-Mart.
Agreed, but that headwall is probably the steepest on-trail pitch at K, and the trail in general gets just about zero pub, therefore my "underrated" tag.2knees said:vertigo huh. With the exception of the steep but very short headwall, i wouldnt think of this as anything more than a nice practice bump run. I love it myself, but until this year, the lower half was actually rated blue. It does, however, often have the sweetest lines to be found.