• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Killllington ๐ŸŽฟ๐Ÿ‚๐Ÿ‚๐ŸŽฟ๐ŸŽฟ๐Ÿ‚๐Ÿ‚๐ŸŽฟ๐Ÿ˜€

Newpylong

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2005
Messages
5,457
Points
113
Location
Upper Valley, NH
Gotta put yourself in their shoes: they want to spend X per year. The village is not there yet and as others have mentioned what happens to RH and Snowshed are tied at the hip to the village. It does not make any sense to touch those lifts yet. That said, ever since the Snowdon 6 went in, the RH4 has seen less usage. I do see it going to a non-bubble 6 eventually, as well as a new lift on Snowshed which would also be a non-bubble 6.

In a massive icing event, the S3 is literally the only option out of the basin, they have to protect that option and going to a detachable makes no sense given its "secondary" status, so a FG4 makes perfect sense. It will also be slightly more appealing on busy days to people waiting for K-1 or those planning on going down to the S6. It really is the only logical lift replacement in the near term given all of these realities.
 

urungus

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
2,396
Points
113
Location
Western Mass
It really is the only logical lift replacement in the near term given all of these realities.

What about Bear Mountain Quad, it is Killingtonโ€™s only other lift dating to the 1970s, there is no backup lift going up Bear, and there is the fancy new real estate coming online at Base Camp ?
 

drjeff

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,567
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn, CT
What about Bear Mountain Quad, it is Killingtonโ€™s only other lift dating to the 1970s, there is no backup lift going up Bear, and there is the fancy new real estate coming online at Base Camp ?
Don't think I can recall a time where the Bear Mountain Quad and reliability, have been an issue. Can't say the same about the Snowdon Triple. Those Poma Alpha's, Like the Bear Mtn Quad is, just have proven themselves over decades now, to be reliable workhorses with proper maintenace, like it has received
 

Newpylong

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2005
Messages
5,457
Points
113
Location
Upper Valley, NH
The Bear Quad is low hours and is bulletproof, and while it's the primary lift on Bear proper, it doesn't even run most mid-week days. They have lots of parts for it.

It would only be replaced with another FG4 in all likelihood as well, so not a priority. It will need to be addressed at some point though.
 

machski

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
4,136
Points
113
Location
Northwood, NH (Sunday River, ME)
But when they put in a 6 (or maybe even an 8) at Ramshead, will they necessarily up the capacity? Look at Superstar, going from a 4 to a 6 but keeping the capacity at essentially the same.

More seats on a carrier doesn't always mean more capacity. Especially if they feel the current downhill traffic levels are saturated
They will if the interconnect happens. I would suspect by the time the village begins to take shape and Ramshead upgrade is finally undertaken, they will know if they are doing the interconnect. Ramshead will be a primary feed into that expansion and connect, so they have to know that before they finalize the Ramshead chair replacement.
 

skiur

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
1,766
Points
113
They will if the interconnect happens. I would suspect by the time the village begins to take shape and Ramshead upgrade is finally undertaken, they will know if they are doing the interconnect. Ramshead will be a primary feed into that expansion and connect, so they have to know that before they finalize the Ramshead chair replacement.

The interconnect will be a separate lift.
 

skiur

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
1,766
Points
113
The iteration that was previously approved (but lapsed) had RH chair being the feeder lift from the K side.

I thought it needed to go higher than the current lift and I didn't think they wanted the main lift going higher?
 

machski

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
4,136
Points
113
Location
Northwood, NH (Sunday River, ME)
I thought it needed to go higher than the current lift and I didn't think they wanted the main lift going higher?
That may well be that the interconnect goes higher (as in coming out of the connection), but RH will be the gateway into that. Of course, listening to the recent Storm ski podcast, sounds like Mike and Senior executives think the interconnect to be beyond the 10 year plan. If so, I believe that will delay a Ramshead replacement for some time until they know exactly what the plans are there. Otherwise they risk either over building a lift at RH or under building it and needing to replace inside a decade.
 
Top