• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

another accident- Natasha Richardson in critical

SkiDork

New member
Joined
Apr 15, 2004
Messages
3,620
Points
0
Location
Merrick, NY
ski helmets DO NOT cushion (althought I wish they would especially when my head gets knocked by the chairlift bar). THey only spread impact.

Really?? What do you call that squishy stuff in the helmet I can squish down?


mine isn't squishy at all. It's very hard styrofoam. I can't depress it with even a hard fingerpress. Like I said, I wish mine cushioned more because if I hit it with something it freakin HURTS!!@! I have a G10 Gyro.

But Mondeo basically set me straight. Apparently it needs to be hard so it cushions on HARD impacts.
 

mondeo

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,431
Points
0
Location
E. Hartford, CT
Apparently it needs to be hard so it cushions on HARD impacts.
Just some further explanation on this, in case some might find it interesting. Basically, foams are a bunch of baloons fit together. Squeeze a little, they compress some, and then go back to their orignal shape when you let go. Squeeze harder, a few of the weaker ones will burst, and only the ones that don't burst return to their original form - resulting in a depression in the foam.

So think about placing a baloon on your forehead and then slamming your head into a wall. If you do it lightly, the baloon will feel nice and soft, and won't burst. A little harder, the baloon will burst, but will have taken enough of the energy that the impact with the wall won't be as bad. But if you hit your head against the wall with a force comparable to dropping your head, say, from 5 feet in the air, the baloon will burst and your head hits the wall pretty hard.

Now try the mental experiment with a basketball. At the level that the baloon feels nice and soft, the basketball is unforgiving and uncomfortable. But at the extreme end, the basketball is pretty firm but has enough give to make the impact less severe than with a baloon that pops instantly.

For any specific scenario, the ideal foam is just soft enough that the last little baloon bursts at the very end of the impact. The foam in the helmet is probably selected so that it will start deforming when it needs to decelerate a head at 15g's or above, or something like that (where there's a risk of brain damage.) So, disregarding the interaction between head and body, with an 8lb head, the foam needs to resist 120 pouds spread out over a typical contact area with the head, without deforming.

Incidentally, in college I designed the crush zone for a Formula SAE car. We ended up using a foam originally designed for nuclear material transport containers. The stuff was stiff enough that you could stand on a fairly small piece of it without leaving a mark. As a result, I have some experience engineering foam impact attenuators.
 

bigbog

Active member
Joined
Feb 17, 2004
Messages
4,882
Points
38
Location
Bangor and the state's woodlands
....

Marker's M3 cushions on the outside and the additional pads work on the very inside...it is still rather rigid inside...would like to have a full layer that's softer ...next to the skull, then it seems like it would be a great helmet. It would be larger, but not by much... Softer pads are stuck onto the rigid rim....would like to have a whole layer of the soft stuff...as in whitewater helmets. Guess maybe the physics dictate otherwise...but a WW helmet sure feels safer, even though the slightly older ones don't cover the ears as much as the newest ones...= look much the same as some of the newest skiing helmets seen in the mags...
$.01
 
Last edited:

mondeo

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,431
Points
0
Location
E. Hartford, CT
Talking about Bicycle helmets but all helmets pretty much work the same.

Good for a single absorbtion of the impact by sacrificing the foam. Once squashed that area of foam will not spring back and protect you there again.

http://www.helmets.org/general.htm

Good read.
Marker's M3 cushions on the outside and the additional pads work on the very inside...it is still rather rigid inside...would like to have a full layer that's softer ...next to the skull, then it seems like it would be a great helmet. It would be larger, but not by much... Softer pads are stuck onto the rigid rim....would like to have a whole layer of the soft stuff...as in whitewater helmets. Guess maybe the physics dictate otherwise...but a WW helmet sure feels safer, even though the slightly older ones don't cover the ears as much as the newest ones...= look much the same as some of the newest skiing helmets seen in the mags...
$.01

As the longer explanation linked above mentioned, it's a tradeoff. Adding a layer of softer foam/fabric/whatever would not hurt the impact absorption as long as you kept the stiffer layer just as thick, but you'd then have to make the helmet that much thicker to compensate. You could protect against harder impacts by having thicker rigid foam, but again, larger helmet. Same thickness, make the foam more rigid, increase the chance for minor injuries but protect against death better. Everything's a trade-off.
 

SkiDork

New member
Joined
Apr 15, 2004
Messages
3,620
Points
0
Location
Merrick, NY
mondeo, why can't they have another layer inside the hard foam thats softer? This way the soft layer can handle the lower speed impacts and make it nice and comfy. Then when you have a higher speed impact, you're through the softer layer and the hard layer goes to work.
 

catskills

Active member
Joined
Dec 26, 2004
Messages
1,345
Points
38
When ski patrol, EMT, or Paramedic says go to the hospital then go to the damn hospital.

Yes we all should wear a helmet. Helmet may have saved Natasha. Emphasis on "may". Getting a helicopter ride to a level 1 trauma center hospital would have had a much better chance of saving Natasha's life. As a ski patroller and EMT-B I have to work way to hard sometimes to convince people they really need to go to the hospital. Sometimes I try every trick I have learned over 11 years and its still not enough. This is when I let some other health care provider try their bag of tricks of convincing the patient they need additional medical care.

The medical examiner ruled her death an accident, and doctors said she might have survived had she received immediate treatment. However, nearly four hours elapsed between her lethal fall and her admission to a hospital.

End of discussion. Now lets celebrate Natasha's life.
 

mondeo

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,431
Points
0
Location
E. Hartford, CT
mondeo, why can't they have another layer inside the hard foam thats softer? This way the soft layer can handle the lower speed impacts and make it nice and comfy. Then when you have a higher speed impact, you're through the softer layer and the hard layer goes to work.
They could, but it's a question of whether consumers are willing to accept the additional size (probably at least an additional quarter inch layer) and cost. Foam is out, because it'll get destroyed pretty quickly if it's absorbing all the little impacts. A gel might work.
 

SkiDork

New member
Joined
Apr 15, 2004
Messages
3,620
Points
0
Location
Merrick, NY
They could, but it's a question of whether consumers are willing to accept the additional size (probably at least an additional quarter inch layer) and cost. Foam is out, because it'll get destroyed pretty quickly if it's absorbing all the little impacts. A gel might work.


yeah - that sounds great. I'd definitely buy a helmet like that. Thanks.
 

Jisch

New member
Joined
Dec 15, 2008
Messages
315
Points
0
In the local paper there was an article about Natasha's death. There was a sidebar about Canada requiring helmets on the slopes. Apparently it was an intiative that was re-ignited with this incident.

John
 

mondeo

New member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,431
Points
0
Location
E. Hartford, CT
Helmets should be required!!!!
And while you're at it, outlaw smoking and alcohol (while keeping pot illegal,) drop the national speed limit to 30, make all scissors, pencils, etc, the same kind you give kindergarteners, ...

Actually, put everyone in an individual padded cell, have robots farm what's nutrionally necessary, and no one actually does anything. That'll reduce physical risks like nothing else!
 

2Planker

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2007
Messages
1,754
Points
113
Location
MWV, NH
When ski patrol, EMT, or Paramedic says go to the hospital then go to the damn hospital.

Yes we all should wear a helmet. Helmet may have saved Natasha. Emphasis on "may". Getting a helicopter ride to a level 1 trauma center hospital would have had a much better chance of saving Natasha's life. As a ski patroller and EMT-B I have to work way to hard sometimes to convince people they really need to go to the hospital. Sometimes I try every trick I have learned over 11 years and its still not enough. This is when I let some other health care provider try their bag of tricks of convincing the patient they need additional medical care.

The medical examiner ruled her death an accident, and doctors said she might have survived had she received immediate treatment. However, nearly four hours elapsed between her lethal fall and her admission to a hospital.

End of discussion. Now lets celebrate Natasha's life.



As a 25+ year NSP patroller and a Trauma Surgeon all I can say is People don't always listen, and sign themselves out AMA - Against Medical Advice....
 

kingslug

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
7,456
Points
113
Location
Draper utah
Well it looks like Liam wants to sue Tremblant...because somebody has to pay...might as well be them. Unreal!
 
Top