How much fun would 'open bowl' skiing be on man made snow?
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Pretty much Stowe is the only one I can think of at this point and it is because, as DHS said, they were aiming to make it like Austria and make it different from the narrow treed in runs of the rest of the Northeast. Other "open," or formerly open areas of that era include possibly Cranmore.
Killington's wider terrain is from a much later era and again was in response to folks who skied out west and wanted wider terrain back east. So this monstrosity is due to that demand:
Before:
![]()
After (far right):
![]()
How much fun would 'open bowl' skiing be on man made snow?
This was planned back in the 70's but never built
http://www.newenglandskihistory.com/cancelledskiareas/NewHampshire/willardbasin.php
"A ravine was to be clearcut to 2,000 wide, to resemble Tuckerman Ravine on nearby Mt. Washington."
Need more forest fires.
In 1908, a great forest fire in July burned across the north side of Sugarloaf toward Crocker Mountain with a total loss of about 5500 acres. This fire provided some of the “above treeline” skiing on Sugarloaf Mountain, which we enjoy today
http://www.carrabassettvalley.org/content/4007/Carrabassett_History_/
I would say the Slides at Whiteface offer somewhat of the bowl type of atmosphere. (when they actually have enough snow to ski on). I thought I was going to get the chance to ski them last year on the last weekend of March but they were closed:angry:
While I would never want to see the mountain clear cut (I agree with Wa-loaf learn to ski the trees) Plattekill has the perfect bowl shape. The trails off of F lift at Hunter are kind of a bowl as well.
Alex
Lake Hopatcong, NJ
![]()
What is that bridge looking thing running across the middle and up the mountain? It looks like some sort of monorail...
This has got to be one of the worst threads in the history of alpinezone.
This has got to be one of the worst threads in the history of alpinezone.
Sugarloaf is the only ski area in the East that offers open bowl skiing a la what's offered in Western resorts. And still, it's not exactly like Western resorts, as the area of above the tree line skiing is not really that extensive. You can, of course, go to Tuck's or some other backcountry to have the experience, but I'm talking about lift served open bowl skiing.
Why don't more eastern ski areas remove all the trees from the summit of some of their peaks in order to replicate an open bowl skiing experience. Don't get me wrong, I love tree skiing and classic New England trails. Much more character than wide freeways. However, there is something quite exhilarating and beautiful about wide open bowl skiing.
Is it just illegal to do something like this or do ski areas just have no interest in doing this?
Also, you are incorrect in stating that Sugarloaf is the only resort in the East offering this experience. With modest hikes (<30 minutes), you can enjoy this experience at both Stowe and Saddleback.
Don't you have to hike to get above the treeline at Sugarloaf?
As in bvibert's avi
![]()