Ignore that the video above had it covered from Burlington Free Press.
Sooo..... has anyone skied it, :uzi:
Sooo..... has anyone skied it, :uzi:
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Ignore that the video above had it covered from Burlington Free Press.
Sooo..... has anyone skied it, :uzi:
Why bother? The skiing where they didn't cut is much better.Sooo..... has anyone skied it, :uzi:
Sooo..... has anyone skied it, :uzi:
It is likely grown up with saplings and complete shit. As Metsky said, you don't need a trail out there, things are open and beautiful as is. The illegal trail ruined that particular swath in the long run.
Yeah I'm wondering what it's like today after 4 years. Should be fresh growth.
Still isn't it ironic that when we have slides at whiteface, it's exciting for the runs to change, but then tragic here?![]()
Anyway. I've never done just backcountry skiing, other than Tucks. I'd love to try it this year.
Yeah I'm wondering what it's like today after 4 years. Should be fresh growth.
Still isn't it ironic that when we have slides at whiteface, it's exciting for the runs to change, but then tragic here?![]()
Anyway. I've never done just backcountry skiing, other than Tucks. I'd love to try it this year.
The guys cut a trail without permission on protected state habitat. It was 3/4 a mile long and 60 feet wide in some areas. The slide, on the otherhand, was a natural act. There is quite a difference.
I know ... and I'm not defending what the guys did. All I'm saying is the result is fairly similar, isn't it? A swath of trees and vegetation gone?
I know ... and I'm not defending what the guys did. All I'm saying is the result is fairly similar, isn't it? A swath of trees and vegetation gone?
On the very abstract level I guess. But looking at the actions, one upshot of their actions were that other law abiding skiers and riders were prevented from accessing Big Jay for their own off piste pursuits. There is a huge debate going on regarding if pruning is proper or not.
On the very abstract level I guess. But looking at the actions, one upshot of their actions were that other law abiding skiers and riders were prevented from accessing Big Jay for their own off piste pursuits. There is a huge debate going on regarding if pruning is proper or not.
Did you mean to say a negative of it was other skiers / riders being prevented from accessing Big Jay?
Big Jay was closed by the GMC and the State for at least a while to allow the area to recover.
Learn to ski in the trees.
Yeah, that's what I thought. You said an "upshot" of their actions was it being shut down :smash:
Right. As a result of the two illegal cutters, all skiers, riders, and hikers were prevented from accessing Big Jay by the footpath from Jay Peak.
:blink:
Isn't "upshot" a good thing?
IOW it's like saying, "On the plus side, at least all skiers riders and hikers were prevented from accessing Big Jay"