from_the_NEK
Active member
Are you talking about Jungle?but at least the skiing will be worth it since they actually leave their glades intact instead of destroying them to "clean them out".
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Are you talking about Jungle?but at least the skiing will be worth it since they actually leave their glades intact instead of destroying them to "clean them out".
I just took a browse over on Burke's facebook page. I'm kind of surprised that they aren't getting blasted. That's usually the first thing to happen when a business makes a controversial decision, their social media goes haywire.
Do you think Burke is deleting wall posts on the subject or people haven't figured out what's going on?
I've got a Fox44 pass I hope to use up there myself this season. Love the mountain. Not fond of this business decision though and I don't even MTB. I just recognize how hugely important the Kingdom Trails are and this seems like a slap in the face to all those who worked so hard to get it going.
EDIT: the article just hit the Cal Rec.
Now WCAX: http://www.wcax.com/story/24268765/burke-ends-partnership-with-kingdom-trails
It's the gift that keeps on giving! :lol: You reap what you sow!
And there are a lot more comments on their FB page.
They were there yesterday...hard to find them. And folks have not really heard because VTDigger.org ran the article and not some mainstream traditional media outlet. It will now trickle down...probably Cal Rec, WCAX, etc. So over the next few days, maybe weeks, they will get additional ire from folks. The PR gift that keeps on giving...and at the beginning of the season. How awesome. :roll:
I like how everyone is jumping ship as if that somehow that gets the message the to Q, he just lets more people go when the bottom line is out of reach, way to stick it to the man. Ski it, support KT, support the NEK, I don't get the imaginary lines being drawn.
Yeah, I missed seeing the posts until I went back for a second look. For the most part the criticism was in good taste and respectful. I'm not envious of your position in situations like these Andrew, but I'm sure you know it's part of the gig. Have to have tough skin to work in marketing in the ski business. Us customers tend to bitch a lot. :lol:
NEK- talking up the mountain and the people who we truly interact with there don't change. Q ain't coming down from his loft the drink PBR's with anyone. I can see people's distaste, I too think the choices being made reflect what I feared the most, owners willing to sacrifice for the bottom line with what seems like myopia. But everyone throwing in the towel on the place is ridiculous, it doesn't hurt Q and the people with the money already, it hurts the people we know, the ones who will still be there when and if these "business" men move on to something more lucrative.
I realized somewhere along the way through my cynical outlook I was spending to much time thinking about all the stuff that seemed wrong about all this development. Meanwhile, I drew some odd lines, wouldn't pay for a pass, wouldn't go the waterpark, etc which is all evident in my previous posts. I began to find myself looking in from the outside, missing friends I had made over the years that were in those places. It finally dawned on me what these grand "deciders" choose to do doesn't change the people who live here and will continue to live here. It may mean the second home crew moves on, but they always get replaced by the next focus group. I think people just need to take a deep breath, your gonna have a great time skiing the hill, enjoying the last days of the bear den with all the familiar faces you have come to know, screw em, they may not give a shit, but cutting of your own nose doesn't teach them anything, supporting the community is different than supporting the owner, its just a perception game
I realized somewhere along the way through my cynical outlook I was spending to much time thinking about all the stuff that seemed wrong about all this development. Meanwhile, I drew some odd lines, wouldn't pay for a pass, wouldn't go the waterpark, etc which is all evident in my previous posts. I began to find myself looking in from the outside, missing friends I had made over the years that were in those places. It finally dawned on me what these grand "deciders" choose to do doesn't change the people who live here and will continue to live here. It may mean the second home crew moves on, but they always get replaced by the next focus group. I think people just need to take a deep breath, your gonna have a great time skiing the hill, enjoying the last days of the bear den with all the familiar faces you have come to know, screw em, they may not give a shit, but cutting of your own nose doesn't teach them anything, supporting the community is different than supporting the owner, its just a perception game
Jay is different than Burke in many ways. For Burke, it can't survive without the community and vice-versa. It just does not have enough draw from out-of-town to survive. We've seen that for many regimes.
I like how everyone is jumping ship as if that somehow that gets the message the to Q, he just lets more people go when the bottom line is out of reach, way to stick it to the man. Ski it, support KT, support the NEK, I don't get the imaginary lines being drawn.
Sorry but I'm not following. You're basically saying the lousier Qburke acts the more we should support them ??? I'll ski Jay , I'll bike KT but I'm not giving money to Burke.