• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Bike Saddles - Fit where you Sit!

Trekchick

Active member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
3,131
Points
36
Location
Reno - North Lake Tahoe
Maybe this has been discussed to a great deal and maybe not, but it bears some input especially since there are some newbie bikers who can benefit from the saddle time spent by some of the veterans.


In a TR, Jeff gave some advice to Grassi21 for his personal bum comfort
While this is good advice, there is much more to it.

From my personal experience, bike fit, including saddle, is very personal.

Up until recently, The stock, cheap, firm, bontrager saddle that came on my Trek Hard Tail, was one of the most comfortable for my shape, and riding style.



When I started trying to fit a saddle for my Klein Attitude SS, I tired several Terry Cycle saddles, including the Liberator(10.4" X 6.6"), butterfly((10.3" X 6.1") and Fly(10.9" X 5.5").. Of those the Fly was the best fit, yet it still put a certain amount of pressure on my sit bones, which actually feels pinchy. I did some more research and settled on the Terry Damesfly. Its a woman specific saddle with smaller, narrower dimensions(10.5" X 5.1") than the Fly, which is mens specific.

I'm loving my Damesfly, yet.....when we rode on Wednesday night Volklgirl switched bikes with me. She said she liked the shape of the damesfly, but she really preferred a saddle with more padding.
What's really funny about this is that I have less 'natural' padding that Volklgirl, and I like the firmer saddle. Go figure.:???:

Point is, two people riding the same trail on the same bike, may like a completely different fit for their Bum.


One thing I love about Terry Cycle and their saddles, is that they have a 30 day money back guarantee on all saddles, which gives you an opportunity to try a few out. Their slogan: Ride it and love it or return it within 30 days for any reason!


Bike shorts are just as important. Too much padding and/or material that twists and tugs can be miserable on a ride! Is this where we begin the Wax vs Shave discussion again? ......... we'll save that for a later discussion ;)
 
Last edited:

severine

New member
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Messages
12,367
Points
0
Location
CT
Website
poetinthepantry.com
Bike shorts are just as important. Too much padding and/or material that twists and tugs can be miserable on a ride! Is this where we begin the Wax vs Shave discussion again? ......... we'll save that for a later discussion ;)
But no padding (i.e. no bike shorts or liners) vs some makes a world of a difference! :D

Wax -vs- shave.... :lol:
 

Trekchick

Active member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
3,131
Points
36
Location
Reno - North Lake Tahoe
But no padding (i.e. no bike shorts or liners) vs some makes a world of a difference! :D

Wax -vs- shave.... :lol:
You are absolutely correct. I can't imagine riding without bike shorts.

Trust me, you spend a ride with the padding tugging at a little hair and you'll know EXACTLY what I'm talking about. :eek:
 

Greg

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 1, 2001
Messages
31,154
Points
0
I also think you sorta just get used to it. I've had no taint issues after a half dozen rides or so. Probably got a callous there or something. :puke:
 

Marc

New member
Joined
Sep 12, 2005
Messages
7,526
Points
0
Location
Dudley, MA
Website
www.marcpmc.com
I got some small sores at the PMC from the consective six hours and the four and a half hours in the saddle, but not bad. Generally, as long as I'm riding a fairly high quality seat, I don't have issues.

And if I do, well, that's why there's Chamois Butt'r.
 

MR. evil

New member
Joined
Nov 29, 2007
Messages
3,547
Points
0
I have never had a problem fiding a comfortable seat. My last several bikes have all had some form of a WTB (Wilderness Trail Bikes) seat and I have loved them all. Padded shorts also help. Trurh be told my riding shorts are so old the padding is almost non-existant. FS bikes also make a difference. While you in the saddle just as much (if not more) than on a HT, you are not getting the jarring impacts like you do on a HT.
 

drjeff

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,430
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn, CT
Maybe this has been discussed to a great deal and maybe not, but it bears some input especially since there are some newbie bikers who can benefit from the saddle time spent by some of the veterans.


In a TR, Jeff gave some advice to Grassi21 for his personal bum comfort
While this is good advice, there is much more to it.

From my personal experience, bike fit, including saddle, is very personal.

Up until recently, The stock, cheap, firm, bontrager saddle that came on my Trek Hard Tail, was one of the most comfortable for my shape, and riding style.



When I started trying to fit a saddle for my Klein Attitude SS, I tired several Terry Cycle saddles, including the Liberator(10.4" X 6.6"), butterfly((10.3" X 6.1") and Fly(10.9" X 5.5").. Of those the Fly was the best fit, yet it still put a certain amount of pressure on my sit bones, which actually feels pinchy. I did some more research and settled on the Terry Damesfly. Its a woman specific saddle with smaller, narrower dimensions(10.5" X 5.1") than the Fly, which is mens specific.

I'm loving my Damesfly, yet.....when we rode on Wednesday night Volklgirl switched bikes with me. She said she liked the shape of the damesfly, but she really preferred a saddle with more padding.
What's really funny about this is that I have less 'natural' padding that Volklgirl, and I like the firmer saddle. Go figure.:???:

Point is, two people riding the same trail on the same bike, may like a completely different fit for their Bum.


One thing I love about Terry Cycle and their saddles, is that they have a 30 day money back guarantee on all saddles, which gives you an opportunity to try a few out. Their slogan: Ride it and love it or return it within 30 days for any reason!


Bike shorts are just as important. Too much padding and/or material that twists and tugs can be miserable on a ride! Is this where we begin the Wax vs Shave discussion again? ......... we'll save that for a later discussion ;)

Oh I might as well say it, since we all know that someone will by lunchtime today :rolleyes:

This thread is completely worthless without a return posting of trekchick's "butt shot" avatar pic of a month or so ago! :rolleyes:
diebananadie.gif
 

severine

New member
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Messages
12,367
Points
0
Location
CT
Website
poetinthepantry.com
Yup, I'm sure FS helps. Grassi doesn't have *any* suspension on his bike though. ;)

I swear you guys do so well on your rides and advance so quickly because you're all using FS bikes. You forget what it's like to be on a HT. ;)
 

Marc

New member
Joined
Sep 12, 2005
Messages
7,526
Points
0
Location
Dudley, MA
Website
www.marcpmc.com
FS is over rated for straight up cross country. If I only rode XC I would still have a Ti or Chro Mo HT or an ultralight, short travel FS frame.

Since I don't want to have a mutli bike quiver, so to speak, I go with the AM setup. Also since I don't race.

FS also probably doesn't make that huge a difference in saddle comfort too. I don't remember my butt being any more sore on my HT I was riding three or four years ago than when I switched to my 4" travel GT. It's long hours in the saddle that makes it sore, and pedaling from the same position for long periods of time that creates sores.
 

Greg

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 1, 2001
Messages
31,154
Points
0
I swear you guys do so well on your rides and advance so quickly because you're all using FS bikes. You forget what it's like to be on a HT. ;)

I've got like 5 rides in on the FS. Most of my limited experience is on the HT. FS makes it more comfortable, but doesn't help with technique which really boils down to just having some guts to try things.
 

MR. evil

New member
Joined
Nov 29, 2007
Messages
3,547
Points
0
I can pretty much ride anything I currently do on my FS with my HT. There are many things I can do better on my HT. For one I can climb faster, and it also eaier for me to get over certain things on my HT. I can bunny hop that bike really well. Not so much on my FS rig that is 10lbs heavier. I am also much more comfortable doing drops and jumps on the HT. The lighter weight makes it easier to control in the air. Once I get my HT back in working order I am planning of riding Nass with it during one of the AZ rides. It just needs some new tires and a rear der. I may just convert it to a single speed.
 

Trekchick

Active member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
3,131
Points
36
Location
Reno - North Lake Tahoe
Carrie, I have three bikes.
HT, FS, SS.
I know there is a benefit to using the FS for Downhills, especially if there are obstacles in the path, such as rocks, ruts and roots, and I really appreciate the ability to bunny hop better on the FS, as well as pop over the log piles, but ............
This summer, Terry(DH) rode with me a couple times, insisting he NEEDED the FS. Although the bike is too small for him, he rides it because he doesn't ride enough to warrant getting his own bike(or so he says).
I got back into riding my HT, and now I almost prefer it. I think its making me a better rider, in the long run.

The SS is kicking my butt and is really making my game step up a notch!
 

awf170

New member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
4,380
Points
0
Location
Lynn and Lowell MA
FS is over rated for straight up cross country. If I only rode XC I would still have a Ti or Chro Mo HT or an ultralight, short travel FS frame.

Since I don't want to have a mutli bike quiver, so to speak, I go with the AM setup. Also since I don't race.

FS also probably doesn't make that huge a difference in saddle comfort too. I don't remember my butt being any more sore on my HT I was riding three or four years ago than when I switched to my 4" travel GT. It's long hours in the saddle that makes it sore, and pedaling from the same position for long periods of time that creates sores.

Yeah FS kind of suck balls for long non-technical climbs. I prefer standing if the trail isn't too loose, but with FS standing is not fun. But on rocky climbs FS rules since the back tire actually stays down. On a hardtail it just bounces everywhere and loses a ton of traction.

I rode a rigid on some of the bumpiest terrain around with no bike shorts, and it didn't really hurt much more than a FS with bike shorts. I stood up about half the time, so that probably makes a huge difference.

Also, after about 10 minutes of rode riding on my FS my ass kills. I can go two hours in the woods on bumpy trails and it feels perfectly fine though. Weird. :-?

I can pretty much ride anything I currently do on my FS with my HT. There are many things I can do better on my HT. For one I can climb faster, and it also eaier for me to get over certain things on my HT. I can bunny hop that bike really well. Not so much on my FS rig that is 10lbs heavier. I am also much more comfortable doing drops and jumps on the HT. The lighter weight makes it easier to control in the air. Once I get my HT back in working order I am planning of riding Nass with it during one of the AZ rides. It just needs some new tires and a rear der. I may just convert it to a single speed.

So what do you like more about the FS than the HT?
 

awf170

New member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
4,380
Points
0
Location
Lynn and Lowell MA
Sounds like your ass is used to the pounding.




Oooh yeah. I went there. With nothing to back it up.




No pun intended.


I'm trying to get my ass in shape for the drive up with Keegan today.



He sounded all right on the phone. Is this just part of his plan to molest me in the bathroom at that sketchy rest stop in Vermont?
 
Top