Highway Star
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2005
- Messages
- 2,921
- Points
- 36
Not sure if 163's would be too short.
I'm 5'8" 165lbs. I'm not a weekend warrior. I'm a busy parent but I'd say I'm in decent shape for my age.
I won't hesitate to play a pickup game of bball or football tho.
As far as skiing. I'm just getting back into it but I used to ski groomers and occasional off trail runs
I see.....you will outgrow most of these skis in very short order if you intend to ski more than 10 days a year and improve your skiing. You should be looking at a ~90-100mm waist all mountain ski around 175cm, unless you only ski icy groomers. Here's a very nice setup for $475 that is forgiving enough to get back into it on, you won't outgrow it, is a modern performance design, and will last a long time (100+ ski days). Definitely get the 177cm.
http://www.skiessentials.com/skis/m...-and-back-skis-w-marker-griffon-bindings.html
Review (this is a real ski):
http://blistergearreview.com/gear-reviews/2013-2014-nordica-hell-back
We're talking about spending a bit more, but the difference in level of ski is absolutely massive.
Make sure you go to a decent shop that can properly fit your boots. You can often get a deal on last season's models with boots too. Don't buy a crappy low end boot from sports authority or whatever. You should be able to get into a decent performance boot from a prior year for $300-400. Do this as soon as possible, November into December is really peak selling season for shops and any deals are picked over by then.
Last edited: