• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Favorite mid-sized (vert) hill?

SKIQUATTRO

New member
Joined
Oct 28, 2005
Messages
3,232
Points
0
Location
LI, NY
Hunter is fun durning the week....Plattekill is a great "secret" spot....I'll never ski Mt Snow again.....I grew up skiing there, been back numerous times and the place keeps getting worse: horrible service, dirty base lodge and bathrooms....the place just grosses me out....
 

SKI-3PO

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
191
Points
16
Location
PA
Plattekill doesn't fit into the criteria - they claim a vert of 1100'. Although, I think that's a problem with the criteria as it is a great mid-sized place after a storm or anytime during a good snow season.
 

riverc0il

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2001
Messages
13,039
Points
0
Location
Ashland, NH
Website
www.thesnowway.com
i don't see 1800 vert as being "mid-sized", 1800 is quite large, especially when you factor long run outs at some 2k areas. essentially, sunday river is a mid-sized mountain functionally when you consider 1800 vert mid-sized. i feel areas in the 1000-1200 range fit the mid-range description. when i think of mid-sized mountain, i think of 800-1600 (splitting it up into thirds with the highest vert around 2400).

any ways, my favorite ski area that i have skied that is within the suggested 1200-1800 vert range is definitely magic.
 

2knees

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,330
Points
0
Location
Safe
Magic given decent snow. Bromley is a personal fave. Not a huge fan of Mt. Snow but i go there alot. North face is worth it.
 

andyzee

New member
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
10,884
Points
0
Location
Home
Website
www.nsmountainsports.com
Plattekill doesn't fit into the criteria - they claim a vert of 1100'. Although, I think that's a problem with the criteria as it is a great mid-sized place after a storm or anytime during a good snow season.

Their stats are off, I measured it myself 2 seasons ago and it came in at 1210 ;) Plus as they say, it skis bigger than it is.
 

RISkier

Active member
Joined
Dec 3, 2003
Messages
1,062
Points
38
Location
Rhode Island
I like Sunapee and Gunstock but my picks might be biased by having only skied a small sample of mountains in the midsize range, as defined.
 

Geoff

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 30, 2004
Messages
5,100
Points
48
Location
South Dartmouth, Ma
I don't think vertical drop is the correct way to create a mid-size category. You also have to consider skier visits, acres, facilities, and ambiance.

* Burke, Mad River, and Pico are all mid-sized mountains though they have ~ 2000 feet of vertical. Saddleback is also a shade over 1800.

* I wouldn't call Mt Snow mid-size even though it has 1700 feet of vertical. The place sprawls. Unlike people here who rant about it, I really like the place on midweek powder days.

* I learned to ski at Cranmore at age 6. It has 1200 feet of vertical but it doesn't ski that big. I'd call it "small" rather than "mid-size".

Of eastern ski areas I've been to with less than 1800 feet of vertical, I'd say my favorites are Magic when it's open and has decent cover and Attitash midweek.
 

Terry

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2004
Messages
2,217
Points
48
Location
Fryeburg Maine
Shawnee Peak Me . Fun mountain that always has good conditions, night skiing, and close to home! :beer:
 

thebigo

Well-known member
Joined
May 15, 2005
Messages
2,111
Points
113
Location
NH seacoast
Taking the original question literally I would say ragged.

However I would consider both Attitash and Pico to midsized.
 

riverc0il

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2001
Messages
13,039
Points
0
Location
Ashland, NH
Website
www.thesnowway.com
* Burke, Mad River, and Pico are all mid-sized mountains though they have ~ 2000 feet of vertical. Saddleback is also a shade over 1800.
saddleback claims 2000, but like burke... the lower mountain is all run out and beginner trails. i will give you that burke and saddleback definitely do not ski like 2000' peaks which both claim, but mad river? mid-sized? i would argue that mad river skis even bigger than its vertical would suggest. my runs at mad river are by far the longest runs out of any mountain. most mountains, 20 laps on the chair lift is just getting started but if my legs are still alive after a dozen runs at mad river, i am doing pretty good. mad river is by far the most intense 2k vert in new england for in bounds terrain.
 

Zand

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2003
Messages
4,576
Points
113
Location
Spencer, MA
IDK how many I've been to that qualify in that area. Loon and Waterville ski like most of the areas in this category, but are both above 2,000 feet in vert. Otherwise, the only ones I've been to in this category are Sunapee and Mount Snow. I like Sunapee a lot as a close day trip and I absolutely hate Mount Snow. Night and day I guess.
 

Birdman829

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
525
Points
0
Location
Burlington
Ragged Mountain in NH is mine. Used to go there for day trips as its just over an hour from my house in northern Mass. Some decent glades and cruisers and never really crowded. Nice lodges as well. I've never had a bad day there.
 
Top