I'm sure the Canadian lynx will be discovered. Whether it's an expansion in Vermont or Colorado, it's always the "endangered" lynx that's affected the expansion
Don't get me started! Vermont has endangered bear, birds, lynx, etc.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
I'm sure the Canadian lynx will be discovered. Whether it's an expansion in Vermont or Colorado, it's always the "endangered" lynx that's affected the expansion
Is this separate than what you're talking about?
http://unofficialnetworks.com/ski-u...h-ski-resorts-lifts-ski-runs-thoughts-129508/
Locals don't like.....anything lol
Locals don't like.....anything lol
It's easy to put yourself in their shoes really.
My dad first took me on a road trip out there somewhere in the late 80's. The resorts were all basically the same size with some exceptions (mineral basin, canyons) and there was really very few people hiking the backcountry, they had all that snow and everone just assumed Colorado or Tahoe was the goto spot. Then word started catching on, my time in the 90's there was noticeably busier...people were starting to hike for fresh lines. Then the Olympics....
Now its become the goto destination area for skiers all over, the Wasatch is a long but this strip of land and not all of it gets that nice consistent snowfall like lcc/bcc general area. There's that slice of powder heavy sweet BC that's sooo close to the city that big developers drool over I imagine. A project like this will squeeze them just a little bit more while attracting yet even more people without giving them anywhere else to go.
Yeah I don't have a real historic perspective since I've been out here for three years, but I don't buy the whole "wilderness" line because if you drive up to Guardsman Pass on any weekend it looks like Walmart on Black Friday. It really comes down to land use disputes. And, by the numbers, Utah is still WAY behind Colorado in terms of skier visits. So it is still unknown, but your point on a lot of people in a small area is legitimate. Utah is one of the fastest growing states and outdoor sports are very popular here.
Its pure powder greed no doubt. Skier visits way below Colorado but look on a map and look at the amount of Mountainous areas in Colorado VS. Utah...there's only so much land. Colorado could grow and grow....
Yeah exactly.
The proposal seems reasonable to me in terms of land use. We're talking very small areas on private land.
I selfishly don't want to see it happen only because I want the people on the back to stay there. LCC and BCC are getting pretty crowded. Then again that would be a fun day jumping around
Bring It
The turn earners can move to Montana if they want solitude.